货币政策、融资约束与中小企业投资效率被引量：21

Monetary Policy, Financing Constriants, and Investment Efficiency of Small and Medium Enterprises

下载PDF

导出

摘要采用中小企业板上市企业财务数据,构建非平衡面板数据模型,检验货币政策变动对中小企业融资约束及投资效率的影响。研究表明,宽松的货币政策可以有效缓解中小企业融资约束,而且相对于国有中小企业来说,宽松的货币政策对民营中小企业融资约束的缓解作用更大。进一步,当货币政策宽松时,面临高投资机会和低投资机会的中小企业的投资效率都得到了显著地提升;并且宽松的货币政策可以缩小国有中小企业和民营中小企业投资效率的差距。本文的政策含义在于,今后我国货币政策制定,应根据不同微观经济主体的特征,更多的采取"定向调控"的货币政策,以期使政策发挥最大效用,进而促进中小企业健康成长和经济持续发展。 Using financial data of Small and Medium Enterprises board listed companies, constructing an unbalanced panel data model, this paper examines the effects of monetary policy changeson financing constraints and investment efficiency of Small and Medium Enterprises. The results show that easy monetary policy can alleviate financing constraints, and this effec on private Small and Medium Enterprises is greater than state-owned Small and Medium Enterprises. When monetary policy eases, investment efficiency of Small and Medium Enterprises faced with high investment opportunities and low investment opportunities is significantly improved; and easy monetary policy can narrow the investment efficiency gap between private Small and Medium Enterprises and state-owned Small and Medium Enterprises. Policy implication of this paper is that regulator should take ＂targeted regulation＂ monetary policy in future based on the characteristic of different micro-economic subject, thereby promoting healthy growth of Small and Medium Enterprises and sustained economic development.

作者欧阳志刚薛龙

机构地区中南财经政法大学金融学院

出处《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期11-18,共8页 Securities Market Herald

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71371189) 中南财经政法大学"研究生创新教育计划"博士生科研创新课题(2015B0503)

关键词货币政策融资约束中小企业投资效率 monetary policy, financing constriants, small and medium enterprises, investment efficiency

分类号 F822.0 [经济管理—财政学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献26

1Ahneida, H. , M, Campello, and M. S. Weisbach. The Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash[J]. Journal of Finance, 2004, (59): 1777-1804.
2Asker, J, . J. Farre-Mensa,and A.Ljungqvist. Comparing the invesmmnt beahavior of public and private finns[R]. NBER Working Paper, 2011, NO. 17394.
3Beck, T. , A. Demirguc-Kunt, and V. Maksimovic. Financial and Legal Constraints to Growth: Does Firm Size Matter?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2005, 60(l(1): 137-177.
4Bernake, BEN S. The Federal Funds Rate and the Channelsof Monetary Transmission[J]. A. S. BLINDER, American Economic Association. 1989: (82): 901-921.
5Biddle, G. C. , P. Chen, and G. Zhang. When Capital Follows Profitability: Non-linear Residual Income Dynamics[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2001, (6): 229-265.
6Chen, S. , Z. Sun, S. Tang, and D. Wu. Government Intervention and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2011, (17): 259-271.
7Fazzari, S. , R. G. Hubbard, and B. Petersen. Financing Constraints and Corporate investment[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activities, 1988, (1): 141-195.
8Ganley, Joe and Chris Salmon. The Industrial Impact of Monetary Policy Shocks: Some Stylised Facts[K]. Bank of England working paper, 1997.
9Hao, S. , Q. Jin, and G. Zhang. Investment Growth and the Relation between Equity Value, Earning, and Equity Book Value[J]. Acconnting Review, 2011, (86): 605-635.
10Karim, Zulkefly Abdul and W. N. W. Azman--Saini. FirmI Level Investment and Monetary Policy in Malaysia: Do the Interest Rate and Broad Credit Channels Matter?[J].Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 2013, 18(3): 396-412.