期刊文献+

亲社会行为类型在时间定价影响亲社会行为中的调节作用 被引量:1

The Effect of The Types of Prosocial Behaviors on the Relationship between Accounting for Time and Prosocial Behaviors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考察亲社会行为类型(纯粹利他和互惠利他)在时间定价影响亲社会行为中的作用,为影响个体幸福感的政府企业决策提供参考建议。方法:采用2(实验操纵:时间定价组和控制组)×2(亲社会行为类型:互惠利他和纯粹利他)的被试间实验设计,通过计算预期小时工资的方法操纵自变量,测量被试愿意参与不同类型亲社会行为的程度。结果:亲社会行为类型和实验操纵交互作用显著(F(1,89)=4.07,P<0.05)。对纯粹利他组被试来说,控制组被试利他程度高于时间定价组被试(F(1,89)=4.48,P<0.05)。对互惠利他组被试来说,实验操纵没有显著差异。结论:时间定价削弱了纯粹利他行为,对互惠利他行为没有影响,亲社会行为类型调节时间定价对亲社会行为的影响。该研究进一步验证了时间定价激活经济效用心理定势的理论假设。 Objective :To explore the effect of the types of prosocial behaviors on the relationship between account ‐ing for time and prosocial behaviors .Methods :Using 2 × 2 between - subject design and by means of calculating hour‐ly payment anticipated ,we manipulated independent variable and tested pure altruism and reciprocal altruism .Re‐sults :The interaction effect was significant (F(1 ,89) = 4 .07 ,P 〈 0 .05) .For participants in pure altruism condition ,there was difference between the control group and the experimental group (F(1 ,89) = 4 .48 ,P 〈 0 .05) .For subjects in recip‐rocal altruism condition ,there was not difference .Conclusion :The effect of accounting for time on pure altruism is significant ,but the effect on reciprocal altruism is not significant .In a word ,the types of prosocial behaviors moder‐ates the effect of account for time on prosocial behaviors .
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2016年第7期1024-1026,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 广东省哲学社会科学“十二五”规划2015年度项目(编号:GD15YXL02) 岭南师范学院2014年度人才引进项目(编号:ZW1407)
关键词 时间定价 亲社会行为 纯粹利他 互惠利他 经济效用心理定势 Accounting for time Prosocial behaviors Pure altruism Reciprocal altruism Economic utility mind-sets
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1郑作或.时间结构的改变与当代时间政治的问题:一个时间社会学的分析[J].台湾社会学刊,2010,44:213-275.
  • 2Kaveny M C. Billable hours in ordinary time: A theological cri- tique of the instrumentalization of time in professional life[J]. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 2001,33 : 173-220.
  • 3DeVoe S E, Pfeffer J.The stingy hour: How accounting for time affects volunteering[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulle- tin, 2010,36 (4) : 470-483.
  • 4徐选华,陈晓红.大型水电站工程设计项目生产管理系统研究[J].科技进步与对策,2008,25(10):131-134. 被引量:5
  • 5DeVoe S E, House J.Time, money, and happiness: How does put- ting a price on time affect our ability to smell the roses? [3:. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2012,48(2) :466-404.
  • 6DeVoe S E, Lee B Y, Pfeffer J. Hourly versus salaried payment and decisions abo:t trading time and money over time[J].Indus- trial b- Labor Relations Review, 2010,63(4) : 627-640.
  • 7Pfeffer J, DeVoe S E.Economic evaluation: The effect of money and economics on attitudes about volunteering[J].Journal of Eco- nomic Psychology, 2009,30 (3) : 500-508.
  • 8Li J, Chen Y, Huang X. Materialism moderates the effect of ac- counting for time on prosocial behaviors[J].The Journal of Social Psychology, 2015,155(6) : 576-589.
  • 9张潮,张佳楠.高职生自尊、主观幸福感与亲社会行为的关系[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2015,23(4):537-540. 被引量:21
  • 10Pfeffer J,DeVoe S E.The economic evaluation of time: Organi- zational causes and individual consequences[J'].Research in Or- ganizational Behavior, 2012,32 : 47-62.

二级参考文献48

共引文献163

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部