期刊文献+

专利诉讼的网络分析及主体类型研究 被引量:15

Network analysis and subject type study of patent litigations
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,专利诉讼呈现快速增长的态势,深刻影响着技术创新和产业竞争的格局。以智能手机产业为研究样本,运用社会网络分析方法,研究揭示诉讼主体间的复杂关系,比较分析诉讼主体的差异;在此基础上,采用层次聚类分析方法,定量分析诉讼主体的关键特征,并对诉讼主体进行类型划分。研究表明,诉讼主体在起诉频度、被诉频度和网络位置等方面存在显著差异,据此可以划分为四种类型,在领先企业和追赶企业以外,还存在两类被忽视的诉讼主体,主要为从事专利运营的专业机构;应对专利诉讼不但要重视传统的行业竞争者,而且要高度警惕以上非传统的诉讼主体。 In recent years,patent litigations have increased rapidly,which has a profound impact on technology innovation and industry competition. Taking Smartphone industry as a research sample,the method of social network analysis is employed to reveal the complex relationship between litigation subjects,and the differences of litigation subjects are compared and analyzed.Then hierarchical cluster analysis is used to analyze the key features of litigation subjects quantitatively,and the types of litigation subjects are classified. The results reveal that litigation subjects show significant differences in the frequency of prosecuting and prosecuted,as well as network location. Litigation subjects are classified into four types accordingly. Besides leading enterprises and catch- up ones,there are two ignored litigation subjects,which are mainly professional organizations specializing in patent operation. Not only traditional industry competitors but also non- traditional litigation subjects mentioned above should be paid higher attention in dealing with patent litigations.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期127-133,共7页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目:技术追赶中的专利陷阱及其应对策略研究(71172138) 2012.1-2015.12 辽宁省自然科学基金资助:面向专利陷阱的数据挖掘方法及应用研究(201202038) 2013.1-2015.12
关键词 专利诉讼 诉讼主体 专利运营 社会网络 聚类分析 patent litigation litigation subject patent operation social network cluster analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Blind K, Cremers K, Muller E. The influence of strategic pa-tenting on companies’ patent portfolios [ J]. Research Policy,2009,38(2) :428 -436.
  • 2Bosetti R, Vereeck L. The impact of effective patents on fu-ture innovations in nanomedicine [ J]. Pharmaceutical PatentAnalyst, 2012,1 (1) : 37 -43.
  • 3Shaver L. Illuminating innovation : From patent racing to pa-tent war [ J]. Washington and Lee Law Review,2010,69:1891 -1947.
  • 4Macdonald S. When means become ends : Considering the im-pact of patent strategy on innovation [ J ]. Information Eco-nomics and Policy, 2004, 16( 1) : 135 -158.
  • 5张米尔,孟珊珊,田影.外围专利的测度方法及其应用研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(3):155-160. 被引量:13
  • 6李黎明,刘海波.专利饱和与产业政策杠杆[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(1):115-127. 被引量:4
  • 7Sieberl R, Von Graevenitz G. Jostling for advantage or not:Choosing between patent portfolio races and ex - ante licen-sing [J ]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
  • 8亚当.杰夫,乔希.勒纳.创新及其不满:专利体系对创新与进步的危害及对策[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
  • 9Lemley M A, Shapiro C. Probabilistic patents [ J]. The Jour-nal of Economic Perspectives, 2005, 19 (2) :75 -98.
  • 10HarhofF D, Von Graevenitz G, Wagner S. Conflict resolution,public goods and patent thickets [ R]. CEPR Discussion Pa-pers, 2013.

二级参考文献116

  • 1李玉剑,宣国良.标准与专利之间的冲突与协调:以GSM为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(2):43-47. 被引量:16
  • 2刘林青,谭力文.为研发而申请专利还是为专利申请而研发[J].中国工业经济,2006(7):86-93. 被引量:20
  • 3刘林青,谭力文,赵浩兴.专利丛林、专利组合和专利联盟——从专利战略到专利群战略[J].研究与发展管理,2006,18(4):83-89. 被引量:64
  • 4国家知识产权局保护协调司.中国企业海外知识产权纠纷典型案例启示录[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2010:113.
  • 5State Street Bank& Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group[R], 149 F. 3d, 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
  • 6Lemer, J. Trolls on State Street?: the litigation of financial patents, 1976 - 2005 [ EB/OL]. Working Paper, http:// www. people, hbs. edu/jlerner/Trolls, pdf, 2006.
  • 7Lanjouw, J.O. & Schankerman, M.A. Characteristics of patent litigation : A window on competition [ J ], The Rand Journal'of Economics. 2001, 32 ( 1 ) : 129 - 151.
  • 8Somaya, D. Patent strategy viewed through the lens of patent litigation [ D ]. D'octoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 2002.
  • 9Cremers, K. Determinants of Patent litigation in Germany [ EB/OL] , Work Paper. http ://papers. ssm. com/sol3/papers. efm? abstraet_id =604467. 2004.
  • 10Priest, G.L. & Klein, B. The selection of disputes for litigation. Journal of Legal Studies[ C]. 1984, XIII: 1 -55.

共引文献142

同被引文献200

引证文献15

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部