走向学术研究2.0的高校信息素养教育被引量：5

Information Literacy Education of University Towards Research 2.0

导出

摘要为了探讨学术图书馆的未来,以及科学研究的未来发展趋势,通过对信息素养、学术图书馆中基于WEB2.0的学术交流等领域的专业文献调研,阐述学术研究2.0的定义和特征,介绍学术研究2.0与信息素养中核心价值观和指导原则上的一致性,认为高校信息素养教育与学术研究2.0具备合作基础,对未来高校信息素质教育提出重点关注科学数据素养、学术出版素养、替代计量学等建议,为学术图书馆的发展辨明方向。 In this paper, based on the literature survey of papers on information literacy, scholarly communication and academic library about WEB2.0, this author attempts to present the definition of Research 2.0 and its most important features. There are points of congruence between information literacy and Research 2.0 in their core ideas and guiding principles. Academic information literacy education and research 2.0 has cooperation basis, the author proposes that academic information literacy should focus on scientific data management, academic publishing literacy, Ahmetrics, and identify the direction for the development of academic library.

作者涂颖哲梁红

机构地区华南理工大学图书馆中国海洋大学图书馆

出处《情报科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期31-35,共5页 Information Science

基金 2014年度华南理工大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(社会科学类)(GM02) 2014广东省哲学社会科学项目(GD14XTS02)部分研究成果

关键词学术研究2.0 信息素养教育高等教育 academic research information literacy education higher education

分类号 G254.97 [文化科学—图书馆学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1R. English.The ACRL scholarly communications ini- tiative: A progress report[J]. College and Research Li- braries News, 2004,65 (8):450 - 453.
2P. Genoni, H. Merrick, M.A. Willson.Scholarly com- munities, e-research literacy and the academic librari- an[J].The Electronic Library, 2006,24 (6): 734 - 746.
3Association of College and Research Libraries, Chica- go, IL . Intersections of scholarly communication and information literacy: Creating strategic collabora- tions for a changing academic environment [EB/OL]. http://acrl.ala.org/intersections/,2015-09-18.
4刘彩娥,冯素洁.ACRL的《高等教育信息素养框架》解读与启示[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(9):143-147. 被引量：69
5L.A. Lievrouw.Social media and the production of knowledge: A return to little science? [J] .Social Epis- temology, 2011,24 (3) :219- 237.
6M.J. Luzon.Scholarly hyperwriting: The function of links in academic weblogs[J] .Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009,60 (1):75 - 89.
7R. Procter, R. Williams, J. Stewart, M. Poschen, H. Snee, A. Voss, et al.Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications[J].Philosophical Transac- tions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2010,1926 (368):.4039 - 4056.
8M.M. Waldrop.Science 2.0[J] .Scientific American, 2008,298 (5):68- 73.
9王大鹏.在线合作:科学家和社交网络[J].世界科学,2014,0(12):40-45. 被引量：1
10A.Y. Lee.Literacy and competencies required to participate in knowledge societies[C]//Couceptual relationship of in- formation literacy and media literacy in knowledge societies, UNESCO, Paris ,2013: 3-75.

二级参考文献58

1娄策群,周承聪.信息生态链：概念、本质和类型[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(9):29-32. 被引量：194
2GARFIELD E.Journal impact factor: a brief review[1J. Can Adian Medical AssociationJournal , 1999, 161 (8): 979-980.
3HOWARD 1. Scholars seek better ways to track impact online[J]. Chronicle of Higher Education, 2012 (1).
4http://www.mendeley.com/groups/5861711 Altmetrics.
5PRIEM 1. Scholarship: beyond the paper[J]. Nature, 2013 , 495 (7442): 437440.
6BOLLEN 1, et al. MESUR: usage-based metrics of scholarly impact[CJ IIProceedings of the 7th ACMlIEEE-CSJoint conference on Digital libraries. ACM, 2007: 474474.
7TARABORELLI D. Soft peer review: social software and dis?tributed scientific evaluation[CJ II Proceedings of the 8 th In?ternational Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systens, 2008.
8PRIEM 1, et a1. Scientometrics 2. 0: new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web[J]. First Monday, 2010 (7).
9MANDAVILLI A. Trial by twitter[J]. Nature, 2011, 469 (7330) .
10PIWOW AR H. Ahmetrics . value all research products[1J . Nature, 2013,493 (7431): 159.