期刊文献+

嗓音治疗对声带息肉患者嗓音显微手术后的疗效观察 被引量:25

The clinical effectiveness of voice therapy on patients with vocal cord polyps after phonomicrosurgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价嗓音治疗对声带息肉患者嗓音显微手术后的临床疗效。方法实验组55例声带息肉患者嗓音显微手术后进行3个月嗓音治疗。动态喉镜、嗓音障碍指数量表(voice handicap index,VHI)、嗓音障碍严重指数(dysphonia severity index,DSI)评估患者手术前后主客观嗓音障碍。对照组41例声带息肉患者嗓音显微手术后未进行嗓音治疗,手术前后同样进行动态喉镜、VHI、DSI评估。应用SPSS 15.0统计软件,采用独立样本t检验比较实验组与对照组手术前及术后随访的组间VHI、DSI差异,Mann-Whitney U检验比较实验组与对照组手术前及术后随访的组间动态喉镜差异,配对样本t检验比较实验组、对照组手术前后的组内VHI、DSI差异,Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较实验组、对照组手术前后的组内动态喉镜差异,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果实验组与对照组的手术前及术后随访的黏膜波、声门闭合差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),实验组、对照组手术前后的黏膜波、声门闭合差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。实验组与对照组术前VHI、最长发声时间(MPT)、基频微扰(Jitter)、最高音频(F0-High)、最低声强(I-Low)、DSI等差异无统计学意义。2组术后VHI各值均较术前改善,并且实验组术后VHI各值均低于对照组。术后实验组Jitter值低于对照组。实验组术后Jitter、I-Low、DSI值均较术前改善。对照组术后Jitter、DSI值较术前改善。结论动态喉镜、VHI和DSI能够综合评估声带息肉患者嗓音显微手术前后的临床主客观嗓音障碍,嗓音治疗对患者术后的主观自我嗓音评价及发声稳定性有改善作用。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of voice therapy on patients with vocal cord polyps after phonomicrosurgery. Methods In experimental group,there were 55 patients with vocal cord polyps after phonomicrosurgery underwent voice therapy. Laryngostroboscopy,voice handicap index( VHI),and dysphonia Severity Index( DSI) were applied for evaluation of the patients' voice quality. In control group,no voice therapy was given to 41 patients after phonomicrosurgery. The inter-group and intra-group differences of laryngostroboscopy,VHI,and DSI were compared statistically. Results No statistical inter-group differences of mucosal wave and incomplete glottal closure were found between two groups before and after surgery. No statistical inter-group differences of values of VHI and MPT,Jitter,F0-High,ILow,DSI were found between two groups before surgery. The values of VHI improved after surgery in two groups,and the values of VHI in experimental group were all lower than those in control group after surgery. The value of Jitter in experimental group was lower than that in control group after surgery. Jitter,I-Low,and DSI improved after surgery in experimental group,but in control group Jitter and DSI got better after surgery. Conclusion Laryngostroboscopy,VHI,and DSI could assess voice quality of patients with vocal polyps comprehensively. Voice therapy could improve patients' self-evaluated voice quality and vocal stability after phonomicrosurgery.
出处 《中华全科医学》 2016年第8期1275-1278,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Practice
基金 浙江省科技厅项目(2011C23129) 浙江省金华市科技局重点项目(2011-3-009)
关键词 声带息肉 嗓音显微手术 嗓音治疗 动态喉镜 嗓音障碍指数量表 嗓音障碍严重指数 Vocal cord polyps Phonomicrosurgery Voice therapy Laryngostroboscopy Voice handicap index Dysphonia Severity Index
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Sridharan S, Achlatis S, Ruiz R, et al. Patient-based outcomes of in-of- fice KTP ablation of vocal fold polyps [ J ]. Laryngoscope, 2014, 124 (5) :1176-1179.
  • 2Jensen JB, Rasmussen N. Phonosurgery of vocal fold polyps, cysts and nodules is beneficial [ J ]. Dan Med J,2013,60 ( 2 ) :4577.
  • 3Mizuta M, Hiwatashi N, Kobayashi T, et al. Comparison of vocal out- comes after angiolytic laser surgery and microflap surgery for vocal pol-yps[ J]. Auris Nasus Larynx,2015,42(6) :453-457.
  • 4Wang CT, Liao LJ, Huang TW, et al. Comparison of treatment outcomes of trasnasal vocal flod polypectomy versus microlaryngoscopic surgery [ J]. Laryngoscope ,2015,125 ( 5 ) : 1155-1160.
  • 5Nakagawa H, Miyamoto M, Kusuyama T, et al. Resolution of vocal fold polyps with conservative treatment [ J ]. J Voice, 2012,26 ( 3 ) : 107- 110.
  • 6Cho K J, Nam IC, Hwang YS, et al. Analysis of factors influencing voice quality and therapeutic approaches in vocal polyp patients [ J ]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngo1,2011,268 (9) : 1321-1327.
  • 7Ju YH, Jung KY, Kwon SY, et al. Effect of voice therapy after pho- nomicrosurgery for vocal polyps : a prospective, historically controlled, clinical study [ J ]. J Laryngol Oto1,2013,127 ( 11 ) : 1134-1138.
  • 8徐文,李红艳,胡蓉,胡慧英,侯丽珍,张丽,庄佩耘,韩德民.嗓音障碍指数量表中文版信度和效度评价[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2008,43(9):670-675. 被引量:149
  • 9Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Molenberghs G, et al. The dysphonia severity index :an objective measure of vocal quality based on a muhiparameter approach[ J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res ,2000,43 (3) :796-809.
  • 10姜宇英,王珊,诸葛盼,尤慧华.早期声带息肉患者嗓音障碍调查与对策[J].中华全科医学,2015,13(10):1608-1610. 被引量:12

二级参考文献57

  • 1Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The Voice Handicap Index ( VHI ) : development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 1997, 6:66-70.
  • 2Lam PK, Chan KM, Ho WK, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese Voice Handicap Index-10. Laryngoscope, 2006, 116:1192-1198.
  • 3Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, et al. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope, 2004, 114: 1549-1556.
  • 4Hsiung MW, Lu P, Kang BH, et al. Measurement and validation of the voice handicap index in voice-disordered patients in Taiwan. J Laryngol Otol, 2003, 117:478-481.
  • 5Amir O, Ashkenazi O, Leibovitzh T, et al. Applying the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) to dysphonic and nondysphonic Hebrew speakers. J Voice, 2006, 20:318-324.
  • 6Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 7Guimaraes I, Abberton E. An investigation of the Voice Handicap Index with speakers of Portuguese: preliminary data. J Voice, 2004, 18:71-82.
  • 8Hakkesteegt MM, Wieringa MH, Gerritsma E J, et al. Reproducibility of the Dutch version of the Voice Handicap Index. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 2006, 58 : 132-138.
  • 9Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 1997, 6: 66-70.
  • 10Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Van de Heyning PH. Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. J Voice, 1999, 13:508-517.

共引文献206

同被引文献186

引证文献25

二级引证文献119

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部