期刊文献+

棘突间Coflex动态内固定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病的影像学研究 被引量:9

Radiographic study of Coflex interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨棘突问Coflex动态内固定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病的影像学变化。方法对2010年1月至2013年12月首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科采用棘突间Coflex动态内固定治疗的腰椎管狭窄症病例进行随访分析。60例腰椎管狭窄症患者纳人研究,其中男性34例,女性26例,平均年龄59.4岁;单纯Coflex固定33例,Topping—off手术27例;Coflex手术节段:L1-2例,L2-3 5例,L3-4 19例,L4-5 35例。测量Coflex手术节段及上下邻近节段术前、术后及随访时患者的腰椎椎间孔高度、宽度、椎间隙高度及腰椎前凸角。同时,评价患者术前、术后及随访时Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分及疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。本研究计量数据采用x^-±s表示,术前、术后及随访数据进行配对样本t检验,并对Coflex组与Topping-off组进行独立样本t检验。结果手术节段的椎间孔高度(FH):术前为(19.82±2.38)mm,术后1个月为(22.28±2.95)mm(与术前相比P〈0.05),末次随访时为(19.31±3.32)mm(与术前相比P〉0.05);椎间孔宽度(FW):术前为(11.2±2.02)mm,术后1个月为(11.58±2.13)mm(与术前相比P〉0.05),末次随访时为(11.12±2.21)mm(与术前相比P〉0.05);椎间隙高度(ISH):术前为(7.84±1.56)mm,术后1个月为(10.05±2.39)mm(与术前相比P〈0.05),末次随访时为(7.91±1.77)mm(与术前相比P〉0.05)。末次随访时,FH和ISH的丢失程度与手术上、下邻近节段相比P〉0.05。腰椎前凸角(LL):术前为43.13°±15.93°,术后1个月为38.41°±10.82°(与术前相比P〈0.05),末次随访时为43.10°±13.21°(与术前相比P〉0.05)。60例患者均获得良好临床疗效,术前ODI评分为(65.12±15.56)分,末次随访时为(9.89±1,77)分;术前VAS评分为(8.02±1.81)分,末次随访时为(1.66±0.51)分。结论棘突间Coflex动态内固定手术能够短期增加FH和ISH,但不能长期维持FH和ISH。棘突间Coflex动态内固定手术对于腰椎管狭窄症患者临床症状的改善主要得益于术中的有效减压。 Objective To assess the radiography change of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treated with the implantation of Collex interspinous device retrospectively. Methods Sixty patients (34 male and 26 female) with LSS who underwent the decompression and Coflex device implanted surgery from January 2010 to December 2013 were followed up. The mean age of the patients was 59.4 years. There were 33 cases underwent Coflex surgery and 27 cases underwent Topping-off surgery. The Coflex segment ranged from L1/2 to L4/5 ( L1-2 : 1, L2-3 : 5, L3-4 : 19, L4-5 : 35 ). The foraminal height, foraminal width and intervertebral space height change of the Coflex segment as well as its adjacent segment were recorded pre-/ post-operatively and at last follow-up. Meanwhile, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale(VAS) were measured in all patient pre-/post-operatively and at last follow-up. The measurement data was recorded as x^- + s. And the independent and paired samples t-test was used to conduct the statistical analysis. Results The foraminal height(FH) increased from ( 19. 82±2. 38 ) mm to ( 22. 28 ± 2. 95 ) mm ( P 〈 0.05 ) post-operatively, and the FH decreased to ( 19. 31±3.32) mm at the last follow up ( P 〉 0.05, compared to the post-operation ). The average foraminal width (FW) was 11.2 mm, 11.58 mm and 11. 12 mm at pre-/post-operation and follow up, which had no significant different change( P 〉 0. 05). The post-operative intervertebral space height (ISH) increased from (7.84 - 1.56) mm to ( 10. 05 ±2.39) mm ( P 〈 0. 05 ), and the ISH decreased to ( 7.91 ±1.77 )mm at the last follow up( P 〉 0. 05, compared to the post-operation). The amount of the decreased FH and ISH had no significant difference when comparing the Coflex segment with its adjacent ( Coflex ±1 ) segments ( P 〉 0. 05 ) . The lumbar lordosis (LL) was 43. 13° ± 15.93°, 38.41° ± 10. 82° and 43. 10° ± 13.21 ° at pre-/post-operation and follow up, there was no significant difference hetween preand post-operation (P 〉 0. 05 ). All patients showed statistically significant improvement( P 〈 0.05 ) in the clinical outcome assessed in the VAS and ODI at the time of time up ollpared to the pre-operation. The ODI score decreased from 65. 12 ±13.56 to 9. 89 ±1.77 ; the VAS score decreased from 8.02 ± 1. 81 to 1.66 ± 0. 51. Conclusions Coflex device could temporarily improve tire FH and ISH after operation. However, it couht not maintain the improvement as the follow-up time extended. The surgical decompression is the responsible factor for the good clinical outcome but not the impn)vement of FH.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期513-517,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 椎管狭窄 腰椎 内固定器 影像学研究 Spinal slenosis Lumbar vertebrae Internal fixators Radiographic study
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1SiddiquiM, NicolM, KaradimasE, et al. The positional magnetic resonance imaging changes in the lumbar spine following insertion of a novel interspinous process distraction device[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30(23): 2677-2682.
  • 2RenC, SongY, LiuL, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration and disease after lumbar fusion compared with motion-preserving procedures: a meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2014, 24Suppl 1: S245-253.
  • 3都芳涛.Coflex棘突间动态内固定治疗退行性腰椎间盘疾病的临床分析[J].中国骨伤,2011,24(4):291-294. 被引量:11
  • 4KumarN, ShahSM, NgYH, et al. Role of coflex as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Asian Spine J, 2014, 8(2): 161-169.
  • 5倪文飞,徐华梓,周洋,池永龙,黄其杉,王向阳,林焱,毛方敏,吴立军.棘突间动态稳定装置Coflex的临床应用及中长期疗效评价[J].中华外科杂志,2012,50(9):776-781. 被引量:8
  • 6刘进,刘浩,李光辉,宋跃明,李涛,曾建成.Coflex动态固定术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的中期随访[J].中华外科杂志,2013,51(2):142-146. 被引量:9
  • 7徐丁,徐华梓,陈一衡,池永龙,倪文飞,黄其杉,王向阳,林焱,毛方敏.单纯髓核摘除术与髓核摘除辅助Coflex动态固定术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效对比研究[J].中华外科杂志,2013,51(2):147-151. 被引量:17
  • 8CelikH, DerincekA, KoksalI. Surgical treatment of the spinal stenosis with an interspinous distraction device: do we really restore the foraminal height?[J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2012, 22(1): 50-54.
  • 9DavisRJ, ErricoTJ, BaeH, et al. Decompression and Coflexinterlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2013, 38(18): 1529-1539.
  • 10KhandwekarAP, PatilDP, KhandwekarV, et al. TecoflexTM functionalization by curdlan and its effect on protein adsorption and bacterial and tissue cell adhesion[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2009, 20(5): 1115-1129.

二级参考文献70

  • 1Dickerman RD,Reynolds AS,Zigler J,el al.Adjacent-segment de-generation[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2009,10(2):177.
  • 2Bono CM,Vaccaro AR.Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20(3):255-261.
  • 3Jackson RW.Arthroacopic surgery and a new classification system[J].Am J Knee Surg,1998,11(1):51-54.
  • 4Fairbank JC,Pynsent PS.The oswestry disability index[J].Spine,2000,25(21):2846.
  • 5Hayashi T,Arizono T,Fujimoto T,et al.Degenerative change in the adjacent segments to the fusion site after posterolateral lumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation-a minimum 4-year follow-up[J].Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi,2008,99(5):107-113.
  • 6Korovessis P.Papazisia Z,Koureas G.et al.Rigid,semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis;a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results[J].Spine,2004,29(7):735-742.
  • 7Zucherman JF.Hsu KY.Hartjen CA,et al.A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X-STOP interspinous implant:1-year results[J J.Eur Spine J,2004,13(l):22-31.
  • 8Schlegel JD,Champine J,Taylor MS,el al.The role of distraction in improving the space available in the lumbar stenotic canal and fora-men[J].Spine,1994,19(18):2041-2047.
  • 9Wilke HJ,DrummJ,Haussler K.et al.Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure[J].Eur Spine J,2008,17(8):1049-1056.
  • 10Cabraja M,Abbushi A,Woiciechowsky C,el al.The short and midterm effect of dynamic interspinous distraction in the treatment of recurrent lumbar facet joint pain[J] ,Eur Spine J,2009,18(11):1684-1694.

共引文献36

同被引文献47

引证文献9

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部