摘要
目的:观察无痛胃镜检查常出现的几类不良反应,总结出相应的护理方法.方法:选取2011-09/2012-09在湖北省浠水县红十字会医院接受无痛胃镜检查的患者282例,随机分成A组(n=141)和B组(n=141).A组患者给予相应的干预护理,B组进行普通护理.比较两组患者的麻醉药量、麻醉起效时间及效果,观察两组患者检查时和检查后的不良反应情况.结果:A组、B组麻醉起效时间分别为(39.67±8.21)s、(60.11±12.04)s,两组麻醉起效时间比较,差异具有统计学意义(H=11.23,P<0.05),两组麻醉效果的差异亦有统计学意义(χ2=12.79,P<0.01),麻醉剂用量方面比较,差异无统计学意义(H=2.19,P>0.05).两组呼吸系统、循环系统、消化道、低血糖不良反应情况比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:在无痛胃镜检查或治疗前、中、后进行干预护理,对减轻患者痛苦和减少不良反应及并发症发生率有着积极的作用.
AIM ： To observe the common adverse effects ofpainless gastrocopy, and summarize the corresponding nursingmethods. METHODS ： A total of 282 patients who accepted painlessgastroscopy from September 2011 to September 2012 in RedCross Hospital of Xishui County were randomly divided into GroupA and Group B, and each group had 141 cases of patients. GroupA was given corresponding nursing intervention, while Group Bwas given the general nursing. The dose of anaesthetic, onset timeof anesthesia and effect between two groups were compared. Theadverse reactions before and after the gastroscopy between the twogroups were observed. RESULTS： The anesthetic onset time ofgroup A and B were （39.67 ±8.21） s, （60.11 ±12.04） s respectwely.Two groups of anesthetic onset time has statistically significantdifference （H = 11.23, P 〈 0 .0 5）. The anesthesia effectsin both groups had statistically significant difference （X2 = 12.79,P〈 0.01） , and the anesthetic dosage had no statistically significantdifference （H = 2 .1 9 , P 〉 0 .0 5 ）. CONCLUSION： Nursingintervention plays an important role in relieving the suffering ofpatients and reducing the adverse effects and complication ratesfor those who suffer from stomach ailments before, during and afterthe gastroscopy.
出处
《转化医学电子杂志》
2016年第7期106-107,共2页
E-Journal of Translational Medicine
关键词
无痛胃镜
不良反应
护理
painless gastroscopy
adverse reaction
nursing care
