期刊文献+

机器人辅助腔镜技术处理泌尿系统疾病:单中心600例报道 被引量:11

The robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery treating urological diseases: experiences of 600 cases in a single medical center
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 总结单中心机器人辅助泌尿外科手术的临床资料,提高对机器人技术在泌尿系疾病处理中的认识.方法 回顾性分析2014年9月至2015年11月本中心600例应用da Vinci手术机器人系统进行泌尿外科手术的临床资料.男473例,女127例.年龄17 ~ 82岁,平均(67.2±6.8)岁.对病例的分布、手术方式、围术期和术后情况进行总结.结果 600例机器人辅助腹腔镜手术均顺利完成,无中转开放手术.其中根治性前列腺切除术304例,肾癌手术185例(包括根治性肾切除术9例,肾部分切除术174例,根治性肾切除术+腔静脉取癌栓术2例),肾盂输尿管离断成形术27例,根治性膀胱切除术12例(包括Bricker膀胱术11例,Studer原位新膀胱术1例),其他手术共72例(包括肾上腺切除术、腹膜后肿瘤切除术、腹膜后淋巴清扫术、腔静脉后输尿管成形术、左肾静脉移位吻合术等).117例(19.5%)患者术后出现并发症,无一例死亡.对根治性前列腺切除术和肾部分切除术重点进行了经腹腔和经腹膜后两种手术入路的比较.经腹膜后途径与经腹腔途径相比并不增加住院时间和切缘阳性率(P>O.05).结论 da Vinci机器人手术系统在泌尿系疾病处理中应用广泛,尤其适用于需要腔内缝合及在狭小空间内操作的手术类型.经腹膜后途径行根治性前列腺切除术和肾部分切除术安全、可行. Objective To analyze and summarize the clinical data of 600 robotic-assisted urological surgeries at a single center,aiming to acquire a better understanding of the robotic techniques and emphasize its role in treating urological diseases.Methods Six hundred patients with urological diseases underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgeries from September 2014 to November 2015,including 473 males and 127 females with a mean age of (67.2 ± 6.8) years.The disease categary,surgical procedure selection,intraand post-operative data and short-term follow-up were reviewed and statistically compared.Results All 600 surgeries were performed successfully by the da Vinci system,and none of which was converted to the hand-assisted procedure.Three hundred and four radical prostatectomy and 185 renal surgeries were performed,including 9 radical nephrectomy,174 partial nephrectomy,2 radical nephrectomy plus vena cava thrombus removal.Pyeloplasties for ureteropelvic junction were performed in 27 cases.Radical cystectomy was performed in 12 patients,11 of which underwent Bricker conduit,while one patient underwent Studer ileal neobladder.Other surgeries,including adrenalectomy,resection of retroperitoneal tumor,retroperitoneal lymphadectomy,retrocaval ureteral angioplasty,transportation of the left renal vein,were performed in 72 patients.Complications occured in 117patients (19.5%).No patient died of surgery.Intra-peritoneal and extra-peritoneal approach of radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy were compared in details.The extra-peritoneal approach neither prolonged the hospital stay after the operation nor increased the incidence of positive margin (P 〉 0.05).Conclusions The da Vinci robotic system can be widely used to treat urological diseases,particularly in surgeries requiring suture in a small cavity.Our experiences offer an encouraging experiences on robotic peritoneal surgeries.Extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy are safe and applicable,offering another minimally invasive choice for appropriate patients.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期403-406,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目课题(2016142965)
关键词 机器人辅助腹腔镜 微创泌尿外科 根治性前列腺切除术 根治性肾切除术 经腹膜后途径 Robotic-assisted laparoscopy Minimally-invasive urology Radical prostatectomy Partial nephrectomy Extra-peritoneal approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Hussain A, Malik A, Halim MU, et al. The use of robotics in surgery: a review [J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2014, 68: 1376-1382. DOI: 10. llll/ijcp. 12492.
  • 2Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications : a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [ J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240: 205- 213. DOI: 10. 1097/01. sla. 0000133083. 54934. ae.
  • 3Wang P, Jing T, Qin J, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transposition of the left renal vein for treatment of the nutcracker syndrome [J]. Urology, 2015, 86: 27-28. DOI: 10. 1016/j. urology. 2015.09. 002.
  • 4Stitzenberg K, Wong Y, Nielsen ME, et al. Trends in radical prostatectomy: centralization, robotics, and access to urologic cancer care [J]. Cancer, 2012, 118: 54-62. DOI: 10. 1002/ cncr. 26274.
  • 5Ulmer W, Prasad SM, Kowalczyk K J, et al. Factors associated with the adoption of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States [ J]. J Urol, 2012,188 : 775-780. DOI: 10. 1016/ j. juro. 2012.05. 014.
  • 6Agarwal G, Valderrama O, Luchey AM, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [ J]. Cancer Control, 2015, 22 : 283-290.
  • 7Pick D, I.ee DI, Skarecky DW, et al. Anatomic guide for port placement for daVinci robotic radical prostatectomy [J]. J Endourol, 2004, 18: 572-575. DOI: 10.1089/end.2004.18.572.
  • 8Gin GE, Maschino AC, Massimiliano S, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy after adjusting for tumor cornplexity[J].Urology, 2014, 84: 1355-1360. DOI: 10. 1016/j. urology. 2014.07. 045.
  • 9郑涛,马鑫,张旭,李宏召,高江平,蔡伟,董隽,陈光富,王保军,史涛坪,瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫,丁强.机器人辅助与经腹膜外途径腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术的近期疗效比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2014,35(11):824-828. 被引量:15
  • 10高旭,王燕,杨波,王海峰,叶华茂,王辉清,鲁欣,李耀明,方梓宇,马春飞,施政凯,王林辉,许传亮,盛夏,孙颖浩.机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术107例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2014,35(9):668-671. 被引量:21

二级参考文献46

  • 1丁强,李宏召,张旭,王保军,马鑫,瓦斯里江.瓦哈甫,杨国强,郑涛.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术疗效分析[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(3):166-168. 被引量:6
  • 2Mottrie A, Ficarra V. Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy still be considered a new technology pushed by marketers? The I- DEAL evaluation [J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58: 525-527.
  • 3Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Novara G, et al. Robotic radical prosta- tectomy: a critical analysis of the impact on cancer control [ J ]. Curr Opin Urol, 2011, 21: 179-184.
  • 4Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti institute pros- tatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of resuhs [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2007, 51: 648-658.
  • 5Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards RA, et al. Robotic radical pros- tatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins [ J]. Urol- ogy, 2004, 64: 1224-1228.
  • 6Bentas W, Wolfram M, Jones J, et al. Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up [J]. Eur Urol, 2003, 44: 175-181.
  • 7Pate1 VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, et al. Robotic radical prostatec- tomy in the community setting the learning curve and be- yond: initial 200 cases [J], J Urol, 2005, 174: 269-272.
  • 8Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J, et al. Vattikuti institute prosta- teetomy: technique [ J]. J Urol, 2003, 169: 2289-2292.
  • 9Menon M, Shrivastava A, Sarle R, et al. Vattikuti institute pros- tatectomy: a single-team experience of 100 eases [ J]. J Endou- rol, 2003, 17: 785-790.
  • 10Novara G, Fiearra Y, Rosen RC, et ai. Systematic review and recta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectmny [J], Eur Urol, 2012, 62: 431-452.

共引文献43

同被引文献98

引证文献11

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部