摘要
鉴于纠纷及其解决方式复杂多样,研究纠纷解决必须首先从方法论和分析工具层面厘清两种截然不同的研究进路,即解纷方式维度下的纠纷分析和纠纷维度下的解纷方式分析。从实然角度对当前农村纠纷解决方式开展系统的比较分析,需要从解纷方式维度下的纠纷分析这一研究进路出发。贵州省梧镇的案例分析表明,在新型城镇化进程中,人民调解、信访、诉讼、行政调解是农村社会四种正式的常规解纷方式。从所解决的纠纷的类型和事由来看,四种解纷方式"各有专长",每种方式分别对应着某些特定的纠纷类型;从所解决的纠纷的数量来看,四种方式所解决的纠纷数量都呈现曲折增长的态势;从整个农村纠纷解决体系来看,四种方式已初步形成一种金字塔式的结构分布。
Because of the existence of complex, diverse disputes and of disputes resolution manners, this article starts with an assumption that two research methodologies should be made clear in disputes resolution studies. The article adopts a positivist approach with the purpose of understanding different ways of disputes resolution in rural China in a systematic way. Based on a case study research in Wu Town, Guizhou Province, the study compares four formal, conventional ways of disputes resolution in the process of new-type urbanization, namely, people's mediation, petition, litigation, and administrative mediation. Each way corresponds to certain types of disputes. Moreover, the numbers of disputes resolution in all the four ways have increased in a tortuous way. The article concludes that the disputes resolution system in rural China has started to form a pyramid structure.
出处
《中国农村观察》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期41-52,95,共12页
China Rural Survey
基金
国家社会科学基金西部项目"土地产权制度改革与土地金融发展的制度基础及经济效应研究"(编号:14XJL003)的资助
