期刊文献+

颈椎融合术后邻近节段退变的相关影响因素 被引量:6

Related factors of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical fusion surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨颈椎融合术后邻近节段退变(adjacent segment degeneration,ASD)的相关影响因素。方法:收集2009年1月31日~2011年1月31日在我科行颈椎前路减压植骨融合钢板内固定术治疗的患者,按照纳入和排除标准,共有235例患者纳入本研究,其中男126例,女109例,手术时年龄33~70岁,随访时间5~7年。在术前、术后1周以及末次随访时均行颈椎标准正侧位X线片及MRI检查,记录患者的年龄、性别、随访时间、融合节段数等,通过X线片测量并计算术前颈椎管率、手术前后颈椎弧弦距、钢板边缘至手术节段椎体边缘的距离(plate to disc distance,PDD)等影像学指标。根据X线片上Kellgren退变分级法和MRI上Miyazaki椎间盘退变分级法,将患者分为无ASD组和影像学ASD组。采用t检验及χ2检验比较两组间各指标的差异,用Logistic回归分析ASD的相关影响因素。结果 :末次随访时共有107例患者(45.53%)出现影像学ASD。影像学ASD组患者手术时年龄为39~70岁(53.47±6.33岁),术后弧弦距为0~10.30mm(5.58±2.34mm),上、下PPD均〈5mm 50例,上或下PPD〈5mm 43例,上、下PPD均≥5mm 14例;无ASD组患者年龄为33~61岁(47.56±5.39岁),术后弧弦距0.10~11.21mm(7.63±2.85mm),上、下PPD均〈5mm 39例,上或下PPD〈5mm 62例,上、下均≥5mm 27例,两组患者手术时年龄、术后弧弦距、PDD差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);两组性别比、融合节段数、术前弧弦距、术前与术后弧弦距的差值以及术前颈椎管率均无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示手术时年龄、PDD、术后弧弦距与ASD发生率均有显著相关性(P〈0.05)。结论:手术时年龄、术后颈椎弧弦距、PDD与颈椎融合术后影像学ASD显著性相关,手术时年龄越大、术后颈椎生理前凸恢复不佳以及PDD〈5mm更容易发生ASD。 Objectives: To investigate the related factors of adjacent segment degeneration(ASD) after cervical fusion. Methods: 235 patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed, who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF) in our hospital from January 31, 2009 to January 31, 2011, including 126 males and 109 females. The age ranged from 33 to 70 years(mean 50.42 years). The follow-up time was from5 to 7 years(mean, 65.32 months). Anterior cervical standard anterioposterior and lateral X-ray, MRI examination were performed before surgery, at 1 week after operation and at the final follow-up. The age,sex, the time of follow-up, fusion segment number and radiographic parameters in X-ray such as preoperative cervical spinal canal ratio, the arc chord distance of cervical spine before and after operation, plate to disc distance(PDD) were recorded. According to the X-ray Kellgren degeneration classification method and Miyazaki MRI intervertebral disc degeneration classification method, the patients were classified into non ASD group and ASD group. The differences between the two groups were compared by t-test and χ2-test, and the related influencing factors of ASD were analyzed by Logistic regression. Results: At last follow-up, 107patients(45.53%) showed adjacent segment degeneration in the X-ray or MRI. In the ASD group, the average age was 53.47 ±6.33(39 to 70 years) years, the mean postoperative arc chord length was 5.58 ±2.34mm(0 to10.30mm), 50 cases were with both upper and lower PDD5mm, 43 cases with upper or lower PDD5mm, 14 cases with both upper and lower PDD≥5mm. In the non ASD group, the average age was 47.56±5.39(33 to61 years) years, the mean postoperative arc chord length was 7.63±2.34mm(0.10 to 11.21mm), 39 cases were with both upper and lower PDD5mm, 62 cases with upper or lower PDD5mm, 27 cases with both upper and lower PDD≥5mm. Between the two groups, the differences of age, postoperative cervical arc chord distance and PDD were statistically significant(P〈0.05). Gender, fusion segment number, preoperative cervical arc chord distance, difference of the preoperative and postoperative arc chord distance, the cervical spinal canal ratio showed no statistical difference between the ASD and non ASD groups(P〉0.05). The results of Logistic regression analysis showed that age, postoperative cervical arc chord distance and PDD had significant correlations with the incidence of ASD after operation(P〈0.05). Conclusions: The age, postoperative cervical arc chord distance and PDD are the risk factors of ASD after cervical fusion. Patients with older age at the time of surgery, worse recovery of cervical curvature, and PDD less than 5mm, are more likely to get ASD.Omong all, the influence of age on ASD is the greatest.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期494-501,共8页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 颈椎融合术 邻近节段退变 影响因素 Cervical spine fusion Adjacent segment degeneration Related factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Lied B, Roenning PA, Sundseth J, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients with cervical disc degener- ation: a prospective outcome study of 258 patients (181 fused with autologous bone graft and 77 fused with a PEEK cage [J]. BMC Surgery, 2010, 10(42): I-9.
  • 2Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999, 81(4): 519-528.
  • 3Chung JY, Kim SK, Jung ST, et al. Clinical adjacent-segment pathology after anterior cervical diseectomy and fusion: results after a minimum of 10-year follow-up[J]. Spine J, 2014, 14 (10): 2290-2298.
  • 4Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo- arthrosis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 1957, 16(4): 494-502.
  • 5Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, et al. Reliability of a mag- netic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical in- tervertebral disc degeneration[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2008, 21(4): 288-292.
  • 6邓元,倪斌.颈椎矢状序列测量方法的研究进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2014,24(7):655-659. 被引量:17
  • 7Torg JS, Pavlov H, Genuario SE, et al. Neuropraxia of the cervical spinal cord with transient quadriplegia [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1986, 68(9): 1354-1370.
  • 8李忠海,侯树勋,李利,唐家广,任东风,赵彦涛.颈椎融合与非融合后相邻节段生物力学改变:2次手术率的Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2015,19(4):642-647. 被引量:6
  • 9Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis RJ, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of cervical total disk replacement versus anterior cervical fusion: results at 48 months follow-up [J]. J Spinal Disord Teeh, 2015, 28(4): E237-243.
  • 10Song K J, Choi BW, Jeon TS, et al. Adjacent segment de- generative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fu- sion-associated phenomenon? comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments[J]. Eur Spine J, 2011, 20(11): 1940-1945.

二级参考文献122

共引文献68

同被引文献28

引证文献6

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部