期刊文献+

经腹联合经会阴超声诊断凶险型前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的价值 被引量:68

Value of transabdominal combined with transperineal ultrasound in diagnosis of pernicious placenta previa complicated with placenta implantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经腹部与经会阴超声联合应用诊断凶险型前置胎盘(PPP)合并胎盘植入的应用价值。方法对临床诊断为PPP的51例患者行经腹部超声检查及联合经会阴超声检查,做出超声诊断;与产后手术病理及临床随访结果对照,对两种超声检查方法胎盘植入产前检出率进行总结分析。结果 51例患者产后手术病理及临床随访结果证实合并胎盘植入42例(82.4%),未合并胎盘植入9例(17.6%)。与产后手术病理诊断结果及临床随诊结果对照显示:单纯经腹部超声检查正确诊断PPP合并胎盘植入29例(55.8%),未合并胎盘植入7例(13.7%),漏诊13例(25.5%),误诊2例(3.9%)。经腹部联合经会阴超声检查正确诊断PPP合并胎盘植入40例(78.4%),未合并胎盘植入7例(13.7%),漏诊2例(3.9%),误诊2例(3.9%)。单纯经腹部超声诊断PPP合并胎盘植入的灵敏度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、假阳性率、假阴性率分别为69.1%、77.8%、70.6%、93.5%、35.0%、22.2%、30.9%;经腹部联合经会阴超声检查诊断PPP合并胎盘植入的灵敏度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、假阳性率、假阴性率分别为95.2%、77.8%、92.2%、95.2%、77.8%、22.2%、4.8%。经ROC曲线检验,单纯经腹部超声诊断PPP合并胎盘植入的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.746、95%CI为0.568~0.924;经腹部联合经会阴超声诊断PPP合并胎盘植入的AUC为0.865、95%CI为0.699~1.000。结论联合应用经腹部与经会阴超声检查对诊断PPP合并胎盘植入有较大的应用价值。 Objective To evaluate the value of combined application of transabdominal( TAS) and transperineal( TPS) ultrasound in diagnosis of pernicious placenta previa( PPP) complicated with placenta implantation. Method Fifty-one patients diagnosed as PPP were examined by both transabdominal and transperineal ultrasonography. The prenatal detection rate of two ultrasound examination methods were summarized and analyzed. Results Out of 51 PPP patients,42 cases( 82. 4%) were proved as placenta increta disease and 9 cases were confirmed with no placenta implantation complication. By TAS alone,29 cases were correctly diagnosed with placenta implantation( 55. 8%) while 7 cases( 13. 3%) were confirmed without placenta accreta,13 cases were missed diagnosed( 2 5. 5 %),2 cases( 3. 9 %) were mis-diagnosed. By TAS combined TPS method,4 0cases were correctly diagnosed with placenta implantation( 7 8. 4 %),7 cases( 1 3. 3 %) were confirmed without placenta increta,2 cases( 3. 9%) were mis-diagnosed,2 cases( 3. 9%,2 /51)were missed diagnosed. The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,negative predictive value false positive rate,and false negative rate of TAS in diagnosis of PPP were 69. 1%,77. 8%,70. 6%,93. 5% 35. 0%,22. 2% and 30. 9% respectively,while those of combined use of TAS and TPS were 95. 2 %,77. 8%,92. 2%,95. 2%,77. 8%,22. 2%,and 4. 8% respectively. According to the ROC curve test,by TAS alone,the area under curve( AUC) was 0. 746,95% CI was 0. 568 ~ 0. 924,while those of combined use of TAS and TPS method were 0. 865 and0. 699 ~ 1. 000 separately. Conclusion The combined application of TAS and TPS method has greater value than the TAS alone method in the clinical diagnosis of PPP complicated with placenta implantation.
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2016年第11期83-86,共4页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词 超声检查 凶险型前置胎盘 胎盘植入 价值 utrasonography pernicious placenta previa placenta implantation value
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Ortman A C,Alexander J M.Placenta accreta,increta,and percreta[J].Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am,2013,40(1):137-154.
  • 2李胜利,主编.胎儿畸形产前超声诊断学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2006:565.
  • 3张玉凤,刘庆平,刘立群,王宁宁,廖桂莲,唐红梅,朝葵.凶险型前置胎盘的彩色多普勒超声特征及止血方式探讨[J].现代妇产科进展,2012,21(12):990-992. 被引量:19
  • 4谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:310-313.
  • 5Sholapurkar S L.Increased incidence of placenta praevia and accreta with previous caesareans-a hypothesis for causation[J].J Obstet Gynaecol,2013,33(8):806-809.
  • 6Mc Mahon K,Karumanchi S A,Stillman I E,et al.Does soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase-1 regulate placenta invasion?Insight from the invasive placenta[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2014,210(1):e1-4.
  • 7Garmi G,Goldman S,Shalev E,et al.The effects of decidual injury on the invasion potential of trophoblastic cells[J].Obstet Gynecol,2011,117(1):55-59.
  • 8王晶,杨太珠.凶险型前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的产前超声诊断及临床意义[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2014,10(3):50-53. 被引量:78
  • 9朝葵,杨承东,赖馨丽.凶险型前置胎盘43例临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2013,28(24):3932-3934. 被引量:20
  • 10付晨薇,刘俊涛,杨剑秋,周丽,边旭明,高劲松,马良坤,宋英娜,戚庆炜,宋亦军.前置胎盘所致产后出血病例分析[J].生殖医学杂志,2014,23(3):224-228. 被引量:21

二级参考文献24

  • 1郑美云.剖宫产次数与前置胎盘及胎盘植入相关因素分析[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2004,13(16):2146-2147. 被引量:20
  • 2丰有吉.妇产科学[M].第2版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2011,276.
  • 3曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.2170-2172.
  • 4乐杰主编.妇产科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2007:18-18.
  • 5Chattopadhyay SK, Kharif H, Sherbeeni MM. Placenta praevia and aeereta after previous caesarean section[ J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1993,52 (3):151- 156.
  • 6Chattopadhyay SK,Kharif H,Sherbeeni MM.Placenta praevia and accreta after previous caesarean section[J].Eur J Ob-stet Gynecol Reprod Biol,1993,52(3):151.
  • 7Asensio JA,McDuffie L,Petrone P,et al.Reliable variables in the exsanguinated patient which indicate damage control and predict outcome[J].Am J Surg,2001,182(6):743.
  • 8丰有吉,沈铿主编.妇产科学(供8年制及7年制临床医学等专业用)[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:212.
  • 9Oppenheimer L, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Diagnosis and management of placenta previa[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2007 ,29:261-273.
  • 10Palacios-j araquernada JM, Bruno CH, Martin E. MRI in the diagnosis and surgical management of abnormal placentation [J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2013,92:392-397.

共引文献284

同被引文献311

引证文献68

二级引证文献308

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部