期刊文献+

声触诊成像面积比值法与评分法在乳腺良恶性病灶鉴别价值分析 被引量:2

Acoustic Analysis of Force Inpules Area Ratio Method and Score Method in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨声触诊成像面积比值法与评分法在乳腺良恶性病灶鉴别价值。方法回顾性分析2014年12月~2015年1月于大庆市人民医院就诊的56例乳腺病变患者(62个病灶)的超声检查资料。结果面积比值法准确度77.42%和评分法75.81%比较差异无统计学意义(χ~2=0.045 0,P=0.832 0);而二者联合诊断准确度93.55%高于面积比值法和评分法,差异具有统计学意义(χ~2=6.499 0、7.520 8,P=0.010 8、0.006 1)。结论声触诊成像面积比值法与评分法在乳腺良恶性病灶鉴别中各有优缺点,两者联合可提高诊断准确性。 Objective To investigate acoustic radiation force inpules(ARFI)area ratio method and score method in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Methods Retrospective analysis of ultrasonic examination data 56 cases with breast disease patients(62 lesions)in daqing people's hospital from December 2014 to January 2015. Results There was no significant difference in the accuracy of the area ratio method and the score of 75.81% and 77.42%(χ2=0.045 0,P=0.832 0). The two combined with diagnostic accuracy rate was 93.55% higher than that of the area ratio method and scoring method(χ~2=6.499 0,7.520 8,P=0.010 8,0.006 1). Conclusion ARFI area ratio method and score method has advantages and disadvantages in the identification of benign and malignant breast lesions,the combination can improve the diagnosis accuracy.
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2016年第10期170-171,共2页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 面积比值法 评分法 乳腺 良恶性 Area ratio method Scoring method Breast Benign and malignant
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献61

  • 1Ioan Sporea,Roxana Sirli,Simona Bota,Mihaela Vlad,Alina Popescu,Ioana Zosin.ARFI elastography for the evaluation of diffuse thyroid gland pathology:Preliminary results[J].World Journal of Radiology,2012,4(4):174-178. 被引量:26
  • 2赵亚萍,王鑫.甲状腺乳头状癌的超声图像特征与病理分析[J].医学影像学杂志,2012,22(2):274-275. 被引量:11
  • 3黄晓波,蒋国樑,陈佳艺,陈兰飞,胡伟刚.乳腺癌调强放射治疗和常规切线野治疗的三维剂量学研究[J].癌症,2006,25(7):855-860. 被引量:62
  • 4Darby S, McGaleP, Correa C, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials[J]. Lancet, 2011,378 (9804) : 1707-1716.
  • 5Janet KH, Jan SH. Comparison of three concomitant boost technique for early-stage breast cancer [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006,64( 1 ) : 168-175.
  • 6Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2002,347 (16) :1227-1232.
  • 7Chen PY. Long-term cosmetic results and toxicity after accelerated partial-breast irradiation:a method of radiation delivery by interstitial brachytherapy for the treatment of early-stage breast carcinoma [ J]. Cancer,2006,10(5 ) :991-999.
  • 8Richards GM, Berson AM, Rescigno J, et al. Acute toxicity of high- dose-rate intracavity brachycherapy with the MammoSite applicator in patients with early-stage breast cancer [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2004,11 ( 8 ) :739-746.
  • 9Vaidya J, Baum M,Tobias J, et al. Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy(TARGIT) yields very low recurrence rates when given as a boost. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,66(5) :1335-1138.
  • 10Meng W,Zhang G,Wu C,et al.Preliminary results of acousticradiation force impulse(ARFI)ultrasound imaging of breastlesions[J].Ultrasound Med Biol,2011,37:1436-1443.

共引文献64

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部