期刊文献+

80kVp管电压联合自动管电流调节腹主动脉及双下肢动脉CTA扫描图像质量的评价 被引量:13

Evaluation of image quality of abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA under 80 kVp tube voltage with ATCM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过比较80 k Vp与120 k Vp管电压下双下肢CT血管成像(CTA)扫描的辐射剂量、图像质量,评价低管电压下腹主动脉及下肢动脉CTA扫描的可行性。方法回顾性研究40例患者,随机分成两组,每组20人,分别使用80 k Vp或120 k Vp管电压进行腹主动脉及双下肢动脉CTA扫描,通过定性和定量评价轴位、三维重建图像,并进行Shapiro-Wilk Normal分布检验和独立样本t检验。通过测量腹主动脉、双侧髂总动脉、股总动脉、股浅动脉、腘动脉和胫腓干的CT值并计算对比噪声比(CNR),并评价图像质量。结果 80 k Vp管电压组的血管CT值在538 HU至605 HU,高于120 k Vp管电压组。两组之间的CNR和定性评价没有差异。80 k Vp管电压组的DLP为(203±22)m Gy·cm,120 k Vp管电压组为(780±85)m Gy·cm,有效剂量下降了74%。结论低管电压联合自动管电流调节技术进行腹主动脉及双下肢动脉CTA扫描时可以在降低辐射剂量的同时保证图像质量。 Objective To compare radiation dose and image quality of abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA under 80 kVp and 120 kVp, so as to evaluate the feasibility of low tube voltage abdominal aorta and lower ex- tremity artery CTA. Methods Totally 40 patients who were divided into two groups with 80 kVp or 120 kVp tuber voltage separately received abdominal aorta and lower extremity CTA. The objective and subjective evaluations were done based on axial and 3D reconstruction images. The data was analyzed by Shapiro-WilkNormal distribution test and independent t test. Results The CT number of arteries under 80 kVp tube voltage was between 538 HU to 605 HU, which were much higher than that under 120 kVp tube voltage. There were no statistical difference between CNR and objective evaluation between the two groups. The DLP of 80 kVp tube voltage was (203 ±22) mGy ·cm, and which was (780 ± 85) mGy · cm of 120 kVp tube voltage. The DLP decreased 74%. Conclusions The image quality of abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA under 80 kVp tube voltage with ATCM may meet the need of clinical diagnose.
出处 《基础医学与临床》 CSCD 2016年第8期1135-1138,共4页 Basic and Clinical Medicine
关键词 腹主动脉 双下肢动脉 CT血管成像 管电压 自动管电流调节 abdominal aorta lower extremity atery CTA tube voltage ATCM
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1MC Lange, Zetola VF, Teive HA, et al. Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis: report of two Brazilian brothers [ J ]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 2004,62 : 1085-1089.
  • 2M He, Qin X, Cui Y, et al. Prevalence of unrecognizedlower extremity peripheral arterial disease and the associated factors in chinese hypertensive adults[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2012,110 : 1692-1698.
  • 3Young Y, Chi KK, Ajaka J, et al. Complications with out-patient angiography and intelventional procedures [ J ]. Ca rdiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2002,25 : 123-126.
  • 4Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure [ J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357 : 2277- 2284.
  • 5Davies HE, Wathen CG, Gleeson FV. The risks of radia- tion exposure related to diagnostic imaging and how to mini- raise them [ J ]. BMJ, 2011,342 : d947.
  • 6王敏,李剑.低管电压技术在腹主动脉及下肢动脉CT成像中的可行性研究[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2014,20(1):68-71. 被引量:11
  • 7Qi L, Zhao Y, Zhou CS, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of lower extremity CT angiogTaphy at 70 kVp on an in- tegrated circuit detector dual-source computed tomography [J].Aeta Radiol, 2015,56:659-665.
  • 8赵小英,赵金影,吴兴旺,陈坚,刘斌.自动管电流调节下不同管电压及噪声指数对下肢动脉CTA患者辐射剂量的影响[J].中外医疗,2014,33(23):178-179. 被引量:4

二级参考文献23

  • 1Napoli A, Anzidei M,Zaccagna F, et al. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: diagnostic performance and effect on therapeutic management of 64-section CT angiography. Radiology,2011,261:976 -986.
  • 2Utsunomiya D,Oda S, Funama Y, et al.Comparison of standard- and low-tube voltage MDCT angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Eur Radiol, 2010, 20:2758-65.
  • 3Alkadhi H, Schindera ST. State of the art low-dose CT angiography of the body. Eur J Radiol, 2011, 80:36-40.
  • 4Nakaura T, Awai K, Maruyama N, etal.Abdominal dynamic CT in patients with renal dysfunction: contrast agent dose reduction with low tube voltage and high tube current-time product settings at 256-detector row CT. Radiology, 2011,261:467-76.
  • 5Albrecht T, Foert E, Hohkamp R, et al. 16-MDCT angiography of aor- toiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison with digital subtraction angiagraphy[J]. A JR Am J Roentgenol,2007,189(3): 702-711.
  • 6McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, et al. Strategies for reducing ra- diation dose in CT [J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2009. 47(1): 27-40.
  • 7Huda W, Sealzetti EM, Levin G. Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT[J].Radiology,2000,217(2): 430-435.
  • 8Zhang WL, Li M, Zhang B, et al. CT Angiography of the Head-and- Neck Vessels Acquired with Low Tube Voltage, Low Iodine, and hera- tire Image Reconstruction: Clinical Evaluation of Radiation Dose and Image Quality[J]. PLoS One,2013,8(12): e81486.
  • 9Beitzke D, Wolf F, Edelhauser G, et al. Computed tomography angiogra- phy of the carotid arteries at low kV (p) settings_ a prospective ran- domised trial assessing radiation dose and diagnostic confidence[J]. Eur Radiol, 2011,21(11 Germany) : 2434-2344.
  • 10Sano T, Matsutani H, Kondo T, et al. [Prospective electrocardiogram gat- ed coronary 320-row area detector computed tomography angiography using low tube current scanning with full reconstruction] [J]. Nihon Hnshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi,2013, 69(3 Japan):244-250.

共引文献11

同被引文献81

引证文献13

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部