期刊文献+

Yaw controller design of stratospheric airship based on phase plane method 被引量:4

Yaw controller design of stratospheric airship based on phase plane method
原文传递
导出
摘要 Recently, stratospheric airships prefer to employ a vectored tail rotor or differential main propellers for the yaw control, rather than the control surfaces like common low-altitude airship. The load capacity of vectored mechanism and propellers are always limited by the weight and strength, which bring challenges for the attitude controller. In this paper, the yaw channel of airship dynamics is firstly rewritten as a simplified two-order dynamics equation and the dynamic charac- teristics is analyzed with a phase plane method. Analysis shows that when ignoring damping, the yaw control channel is available to the minimum principle of Pontryagin for optimal control, which can obtain a Bang-Bang controller. But under this controller, the control output could he bouncing around the theoretical switch curve due to the presence of disturbance and damping, which makes adverse effects for the servo structure. Considering the structure requirements of actuators, a phase plane method controller is employed, with a dead zone surrounded by several phase switch curve. Thus, the controller outputs are limited to finite values. Finally, through the numerical simulation and actual flight experiment, the method is proved to be effective. Recently, stratospheric airships prefer to employ a vectored tail rotor or differential main propellers for the yaw control, rather than the control surfaces like common low-altitude airship. The load capacity of vectored mechanism and propellers are always limited by the weight and strength, which bring challenges for the attitude controller. In this paper, the yaw channel of airship dynamics is firstly rewritten as a simplified two-order dynamics equation and the dynamic charac- teristics is analyzed with a phase plane method. Analysis shows that when ignoring damping, the yaw control channel is available to the minimum principle of Pontryagin for optimal control, which can obtain a Bang-Bang controller. But under this controller, the control output could he bouncing around the theoretical switch curve due to the presence of disturbance and damping, which makes adverse effects for the servo structure. Considering the structure requirements of actuators, a phase plane method controller is employed, with a dead zone surrounded by several phase switch curve. Thus, the controller outputs are limited to finite values. Finally, through the numerical simulation and actual flight experiment, the method is proved to be effective.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2016年第3期738-745,共8页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 sponsored by the National Defense Science and Technology Innovation Fund Projects of Chinese Academy of Science(No.CXJJ-14-M06)
关键词 Attitude control Dynamics modeling Optimal control Phase plane method Stratospheric airship Attitude control Dynamics modeling Optimal control Phase plane method Stratospheric airship
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1Elfes A, Bueno S S, Bergerman M, et al. A semi-autonomous robotic airship for environmental monitoring missions[A]. Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics & Automation[C]. Leuven: IEEE, 1998.
  • 2Ruger U, Kroplin B. The remotely controlled airship Lotte as a platform for the measurement of air pollutants[A]. In International Airship Convention and Exhibition[C]. Bedford: AIAA, 1998.
  • 3Lindstrand P. ESA-HALE airship research and development program[A]. In the 3rd Workshop on Stratospheric Platform Systems[C]. Tokyo: 2000. 15-21.
  • 4Azinheira R J, De Paiva C E, Ramos G J, et al. Mission path following for an autonomous unmanned airship[A]. Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics & Automation[C]. San Francisco: IEEE, 2000. 1269-1275.
  • 5Ge M, Chiu M S, Wang Q G. Robust PID controller design via LMI approach[J]. J. Process Contr., 2002, (12): 3-13.
  • 6Scherer C, Gahinet P, Chilali M. Multi-objective output-feedback control via LMI optimization[J]. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1997, 42(7): 896-911.
  • 7Nemirovskii A, Gahinet P. The projective method for solving linear matrix inequalities[J]. Math. Programming Series B, 1997, 27(3): 163-190.
  • 8Nesterav Y, Nemirovskii A. Interior point poly nominal algorithms in convex programming: Theory and applications[J]. SIAM Studies Appl. Math., 1994, 24(1):36-39.
  • 9Chilali M, Gahinet P. H-inf design with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach[J]. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 1996, 41(3): 358-367, .
  • 10De Paiva C E, Bueno S S, Bergerman M. A robust pitch attitude controller for AURORA's semi-autonomous robotic airship[R]. AIAA-99-3907.

共引文献19

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部