英文文献中的海绵城市研究进展--基于Citespace和VOSviewer的知识图谱分析被引量：46

Research Progress of the Sponge City in English Literature:A Scientific Knowledge Mapping Based on Citespace and VOSviewer

下载PDF

导出

摘要国外的海绵城市研究起步较早,在理论研究和工程实践方面都有着丰富的文献积累,值得国内学界借鉴。本文以Web of Science(WOS)数据库作为文献搜索引擎,运用当前国际上常用的两种信息可视化软件Citespace和VOSviewer来揭示英文文献中海绵城市研究领域的科学知识图谱,通过对重要文献、代表学者和研究热点的分析,发现2001-2016年间英文文献中海绵城市研究领域的知识结构与演进趋势,解析海绵城市的相关基础理论、实践经验和技术方法从而对我国的海绵城市理论研究与规划建设提供有益的参考。 The foreign sponge city research is worth learning for its early start-up and rich literature on theory and practice. Choosing the database of Web of Science （WOS） as a search engine, this paper uses two international well-used information visualizing software, Citespace and VOSviewer, to disclose the scientific knowledge mapping of foreign sponge city research domain. By analyzing key literatures, representative researchers and hot research spots, the paper attempts to find out the knowledge structure and evolving dynamic in the sponge city research domain in English literature from 2001 to 2016. By summarizing the relevant theories, practical experience and technical methods of the sponge city, this paper is beneficial to the theoretical research and construction practice of sponge city in China,

作者李志明濮佩君

机构地区南京林业大学风景园林学院

出处《现代城市研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期12-18,共7页 Modern Urban Research

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(41001086) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2015SJB049) 江苏省第十二批“六大人才高峰”项目(2015-JZ-007) 江苏高校品牌专业建设工程资助项目(PPZY2015A063) 江苏省高校优秀中青年教师和校长境外研修计划资助项目([2012]2506)

关键词海绵城市 CITESPACE VOSviewer 科学知识图谱 sponge city Citcspace VOSvicwer scientific knowledge mapping

分类号 TU992 [建筑科学—市政工程]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献36

1刘洪彪,武伟亚.城市污水资源化与水资源循环利用研究[J].现代城市研究,2013,28(1):117-120. 被引量：18
2颜京松,王美珍.城市水环境问题的生态实质[J].现代城市研究,2005,20(4):7-10. 被引量：22
3仇保兴.海绵城市(LID)的内涵、途径与展望[J].给水排水,2015,41(3):1-7. 被引量：342
4Borner K, Chen C, Boyack K. Visualizing knowledge domains[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2003(37):179-255.
5Chen C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377.
6Van Eck N J. Waltman L, Dekker R, et al. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS [J]. Journal of the American Sciety for Information Science and Tschnology, 2010,61(12):2405-2416.
7Gassman P W, Reyes M R. Green C H, et al. Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions[J]. Transactions of the Asabe, 2007, 50(4):1211-1250.
8Moriasi D N, Arnold J G, Liew M W V, et al. Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations[J]. Transactions of the Asabe, 2007, 50(3):885-900.
9Davis A P, Shokouhian M. Sharma H, etal. Water quality improvement through bioretention: lead, copper, and zinc removal[J]. Water Environment Research, 2003. 75(1):73-82.
10Hunt W F, Jarrett A R, Smith J T, et al. Evaluating Bioretention Hydrology and Nutrient Removal at Three Field Sites in North Carolina[J]. Journal of Irrigation & Drainage Engineering, 2006, 132(6):600-608.