知识守门者向集群企业知识转移的流体力学研究被引量：5

Research on the Fluid Mechanics of Knowledge Transfer from Knowledge Gatekeeper to Cluster Enterprises

导出

摘要知识守门者对于保持集群知识系统的动态开放性和集群知识更新至关重要。在对知识守门者内涵深入剖析的基础上,认为知识守门者向集群企业进行知识转移过程中,受到了知识转移主体、客体和转移情境三方面因素的影响。根据流体力学中的线性渗流定律,构建了知识守门者与集群企业间知识转移的流体力学模型,该模型较好地解释了知识势差、知识粘性、知识转移渠道、知识共享氛围和组织距离等因素对集群知识转移的影响。 Knowledge gatekeeper is important for maintaining the dynamic openness of cluster knowledge system as well as the cluster knowledge update.Based on in-depth analysis of the connotation of knowledge gatekeeper,this paper considers that the factors of subject,object and context of knowledge transfer have impact on the process of knowledge transfer from knowledge gatekeeper to cluster enterprises.According to the linear percolation law of fluid mechanics,the paper constructs fluid mechanics model of knowledge transfer from knowledge gatekeeper to cluster enterprises.The model well explains the influence of knowledge gap,knowledge stickiness,knowledge transfer channel,knowledge sharing atmosphere and organization distance to the cluster knowledge transfer.

作者郑准张凡王国顺

机构地区湖南第一师范学院商学院中南大学商学院

出处《情报理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期97-101,共5页 Information Studies:Theory & Application

基金国家自然科学基金青年项目"知识守门者促进产业集群内源式升级的双重效应研究"(项目编号:71502058) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目"产业集群中‘知识守门者’位置行为与影响的理论构建与实证研究"(项目编号:13YJC630238) 湖南省自然科学基金青年项目"基于知识守门者的产业集群内源式升级机理研究"(项目编号:14JJ3140)的成果

关键词知识守门者企业知识转移流体力学 knowledge gatekeeper enterprise knowledge transfer fluid mechanics

分类号 G353.1 [文化科学—情报学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1MASKELL P. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geo- graphical cluster [ J ]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2001, 10 (4): 921-943.
2BATHELT H, MALMBERG A, MASKELL P. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation [ J ]. Progress in Human Geography, 2004 (28): 31-56.
3MUNARI F, SOBRER_O M, MALIPIERO A. Absorptive ca- pacity and localized pillovers: focal firms as technological gatekeepers in industrial districts [J]. Industrial and Corpo- rate Change, 2011 (2) : 429-462.
4GIULIANI E. BELL M. The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster [J]. Research Policy, 2005 (1) : 47-68.
5LAZARIC N, LONGHI C, THOMAS C. Gatekeepers of knowledge versus plaffarms of knowledge : from potential to re- alized absorptive capacity [ J ]. Regional Studies, 2008, 42 : 837-852.
6GIULIANI. Role of technological gatekeepers in the growth of industrial clusters [ J ]. Regional Studies, 2011 ( 10 ) : 1329-1348.
7MORRISON A. Gatekeepers of knowledge within industrial dis- tricts: who they are, how do they interact? [J]. Regional Studies, 2008 (6): 817-835.
8喻建清,徐青,陈胜宏,等.复杂地质条件下渗流控制关键技术研究与应用[J].水力学报,2011,42(增刊):81-86.
9SZULANSKI G. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the finn [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17 ($2): 27-43.
10王伟光,冯荣凯,尹博.产业创新网络中核心企业控制力能够促进知识溢出吗?[J].管理世界,2015,31(6):99-109. 被引量：119

二级参考文献61

1TORRE A., GILLY J.P. On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics [J].Regional Studies, 2000, 34:169-180.
2RON A. BOSCHMA. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment[J].Regional Studies, 2005, 39:61-74.
3J. KNOBEN, L.A.G. OERLEMANS. Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review [J]. International Joumal of Management Reviews, 2006, (8):71-89.
4TORRE A., RALLET.A. Proximity and Localization [J]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39:47-59.
5L.A.G. OERLEMANS, M.T.H. MEEUS. Do organisadonal and spatial proximity impact on firm performance? [J]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39:89-104.
6NORTH D.C. Institutions[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991 ,(5):97-112.
7TUSHMAN M.L., ANDERSON P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31:439 - 465.
8BURNS T., STALKER G.M. The Management of Innovation [M]. London: Yavistock, 1961.
9PETTIGKEW A.M. On studying organizational cultures [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24: 570-581.
10WILKOF M.V., BROWN D.W., SELSKY J.W. When the stories are different: the influence of corporate culture mismatches on inter-organizational relations [J]. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1995, 31:373 - 388.