期刊文献+

控制权博弈中的双层股权结构探析——以破解股权融资与稀释的困境为视角 被引量:25

Exploration of Controlling Rights Game within Dual Class Equity Structure:A Perspective from Solving the Dilemma of Equity Financing and Equity Diluting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 双层股权治理结构使初创企业在获得外部融资的同时,保住了创始人股东对企业的控制权,提升了公司治理的效率。但这种治理模式可能导致对公众投资者利益的侵害以及公司内部人控制等问题。总体而言,轻资产类的互联网科技企业采用双层股权结构利大于弊。鉴于目前我国互联网科技企业迅猛发展的态势,我国有必要借鉴美国双层股权结构的立法经验,考虑在未来引入双层股权的相关制度来破解互联网科技企业普遍存在的股权融资与稀释的难题与困境。 The governance structure of dual-class equity enables start-ups to obtain external financing while the founding shareholder still keeping control of the company, which enhances the efficiency of corporate governance. However, this model of governance may lead to such issues as infringing public investors' interests, insider control. For the internet technology companies with light assets, the advantages of utilizing the governance structure of dual-class equity outweigh the disadvantages. Given the current situation of the rapid development of internet technology in China, drawing lessons from the US legislative experiences of the governance structure of dual-class equity, it is necessary for China to consider introducing the governance structure of dual-class equity in future to solve the problems and difficulties of internet technology companies in equity financing and dilution.
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期69-78,共10页 Securities Market Herald
关键词 双层股权治理结构 控制权 投票权 同股同权 dual-class equitystructure, controlling right, voting rights, equal shares with equal rights
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献148

  • 1江伟,贾长存.论集团诉讼(上)[J].中国法学,1988(6):84-91. 被引量:17
  • 2梁上上.股东表决权:公司所有与公司控制的连接点[J].中国法学,2005(3):108-119. 被引量:95
  • 3檀江来.证券市场集体诉讼 灵丹妙药还是救命稻草[J].特区经济,2006(12):67-69. 被引量:1
  • 4《公司法》第26条第2款.
  • 5伊斯特布鲁克,费希尔.公司法的经济结构[M].张建伟,罗培新译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
  • 6《公司法》第24条
  • 7[英]丹尼斯·吉南.公司法[M].朱羿琨译,北京:法律出版社,2005.
  • 8H.Henn&J.Alexander,Laws of Corporations and Other Business Associations,534--36(3d ed.1983).
  • 9see Joel Seligman,Stock Exchange Rules Affecting Takeovers and Control Transactions,in Knights,Raiders&Targets,J.Coffee,L.Lowenstein&S.Rose-Ackerman eds.Oxford University Press,1988.
  • 10Timothy K.O’Neil,Rule19c-4:The SEC Goes Too Far in Adopting a One Share,One Vote Rule,83Nw.U.L.Rev.1057.

共引文献298

同被引文献149

引证文献25

二级引证文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部