摘要
目的:评价对比鼻胃管与鼻肠管营养支持在脑卒中伴吞咽困难患者的应用效果。方法:62例患者随机分组,研究组采用鼻肠管营养支持治疗,对照组采用鼻胃管进行治疗,比较两组治疗不良反应、临床疗效。结果:研究组治疗后总不良反应为22.58%,对照组治疗后总不良反应为51.61%,均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。研究组治疗总有效率为93.54%,对照组治疗总有效为64.51%,两组差距较明显,具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:鼻肠管营养支持治疗脑卒中伴吞咽患者临床效果较佳,既可减少治疗不良反应,又可提高临床疗效,减少治疗次数,使其整体生活质量得到明显提高,故值得临床推广应用。
Objective：To compare the application effect of nasogastric tube and nasal bowel nutritional support in stroke patients with dysphagia.Methods：62patients were randomized,the experimental group were treated with nasal insufflate nutrition support treatment,and the control group were treated with nasogastric tube.Then compare adverse reactions and clinical curative effect of the two groups of.Results：The overall adverse reaction of the experimental group was 22.58% after treatment,the control group after treatment the overall adverse reaction was 51.61%,the difference of which were statistically significant（P 0.05）.Treatment group total effective rate was 93.54%,control group total effective treatment was 64.51%.The difference between the two groups is obvious,with statistical difference（P0.05）.Conclusion：Nasal insufflate nutrition support treatment of stroke patients with swallowing is of better clinical effect,treatment can reduce adverse reactions,and can improve the clinical curative effect.Decreasing the Times of treatment and improving the overall quality of life can improve the overall life quality,which is worth clinical application.
出处
《数理医药学杂志》
2016年第8期1168-1169,共2页
Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词
脑卒中
吞咽困难
鼻肠管营养支持
stroke
difficulty swallowing
nasal insufflate nutrition support
