摘要
目的:比较张氏腹三针与传统针刺在慢性盆腔炎临床治疗中的疗效。方法:将医院收治的慢性盆腔炎患者分为对照组和观察组。对照组患者给予传统针刺治疗,而观察组则接受张氏腹三针进行治疗,比较两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果:观察组患者的盆腔内包块面积(4.21±0.93)cm2小于对照组患者的(7.34±1.24)cm2,治疗有效率93.02%高于对照组的74.42%,差异均具有统计意义(P<0.05)。不良反应率9.31%与对照组患者的11.64%无明显性差异,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:中医中药治疗妇科相关疾病,疗效显著,如神阙贴联合丹桂祛症合剂治疗寒凝血瘀型痛经的临床研究,张氏腹三针与传统针刺治疗均对慢性盆腔炎具有较好的疗效性与安全性,但是张氏腹三针的疗效更佳,值得推广。
Objective： To compare the efficacy between Zhang abdomen acupuncture and traditional acupuncturein the clinical treatment of chronic pelvic inflammatory disease. Methods： Patients withchronic pelvic inflammatory disease in our hospital were divided into control group and observation group. The control group were treated with traditional acupuncture treatment and the observation group received Zhang abdomenacupunctureand the clinical therapeutic effects between the two groups were compared. Results： The observation group’s pelvic masswas（ 4. 21 0. 93） cm^2 which was less than the control group’s（ 7. 34 1. 24） cm^2 and the treatment effective ratiowas 93. 02% which was higher than the control group ’s74. 42%. The differences were statistically significant（ P 〈 0. 05）. There was no significant difference of adverse reaction rate between observation group’s 11. 64% and control group’s 9. 31%（ P 〉 0. 05）. Conclusion： Zhang abdomen acupuncture and traditional acupuncture treatment of chronic pelvic inflammatory diseasehave a good effect and safetybut the efficacy of the formeris better. It is worth of generalization.
出处
《中华中医药学刊》
CAS
北大核心
2016年第8期2016-2018,共3页
Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
青岛市卫生局项目(2014-zyy018)
关键词
张氏腹三针
传统针刺
慢性盆腔炎
Zhang abdomen acupuncture
traditional acupuncture
chronic pelvic inflammatory disease
