期刊文献+

中文版正性负性情绪量表在乳腺癌患者中的信度和效度 被引量:84

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale in Women with Breast Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评估中文版正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)在乳腺癌患者中的信度、效度。方法:505例乳腺癌患者完成中文版正性负性情绪量表、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)的评估。结果:PANAS正性情绪(PA)量表和负性情绪(NA)量表的Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.937、0.919;正、负性情绪分量表的重测信度分别为0.508、0.481;正、负性情绪分量表的条目间平均相关系数分别为0.595、0.539。正、负性情绪两因子之间的相关系数为-0.674。探索性因素分析结果显示:正性情绪各条目的因子负荷在0.635-0.831之间;负性情绪各条目的因子负荷在0.556-0.779之间。正性情绪与HAMA、HAMD的相关系数分别为-0.578、-0.264;负性情绪与HAMA、HAMD的相关系数分别为0.723、0.330。不同地区和年龄组患者在正性情绪和负性情绪两因子的得分上差异均显著(P〈0.05);不同文化程度患者仅在正性情绪上有显著差异(P〈0.001)。结论:中文版正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)在乳腺癌患者中具有良好的信度、效度,可有效测量乳腺癌患者的正、负性情绪。 Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Positive and Negative Affect Seale(PANAS) in women with breast cancer. Methods: 505 women with breast cancer were tested by Chinese version of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Scale and Hamilton Depression Scale. Results: The Cronbach' s alpha coefficient of Positive Affect Scale and Negative Affect Scale were 0.937 and 0.919 respectively; the test-retest reliability of the PA and NA were 0.508 and 0.481 respectively; the inter-item correlation coefficient of the PA and NA were 0.595 and 0.539 respectively. The correlation coefficient between the PA and NA was -0.674. The results of exploratory factor analysis: Varimax-rotated factor loading for the PA terms ranged from 0.635 to 0.831, NA terms ranged from 0.556 to 0.779. The correlation coefficients between PA and HAMA/HAMD were-0.578 and-0.264 respectively; The correlation coefficients between NA and HAMA/HAMD were 0.723 and 0.330 respectively. The scores of the two factors of PANAS were significantly different between the urban area and the rural area(P〈0.001), the scores of the two factors of PANAS were significantly different among the age groups(P〈0.05), only the scores of PA were significantly different among the educational degree groups(P〈0.001). Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale are acceptable, and the scale can effectively detect the breast cancer patients' positive and negative affect.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期671-674,670,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划课题(2009BA177B06)基金资助
关键词 正性情绪 负性情绪 乳腺癌 信度 效度 Positive affect Negative affect Breast cancer Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Tellegen A, Watson D, Clark LA. On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science, 1999, 10(4): 297-303.
  • 2Russell JA. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychologic al Review, 2003, 110(1): 145 - 172.
  • 3Watson D, Wiese D, Vaidya J, et al. The two general activa- tion systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary con- siderations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology, 1999, 76(5): 820-838.
  • 4Tellegen A. Structures of mood and personality and their re- levance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self- report. In: Tuma AH, Maser JD. Anxiety and the anxiety dis- orders. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum, 1985. 681-706.
  • 5Clark L, Watson D. Tripartite model of anxiety and depres- sion: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1991,100(3): 316-336.
  • 6Joiner TE, Lonigan CJ. Tripartite model of depression and anxiety in youth psychiatric inpatients: Relations with diag- nostic status and future symptoms. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 2000, 29(3): 372-382.
  • 7Glaser R, Kiecoh-Glaser JK. Stress-induced immune dys- function: Implications for health. Nature Reviews Immunolo- gy, 2005, 5(3): 243-251.
  • 8Sally NA, Temidayo O, Clement A. Emerging breast cancer epidemic: Evidence from Africa. Breast Cancer Research, 2010, 12(S4): 8.
  • 9Sandra Perez, Andrea Conchado, Yolanda Andreu, et al. Acute stress trajectories 1 year after a breast cancer diagno- sis. Support Care Cancer, 2015, 24(4): 1671-1678.
  • 10Lyons MA, Jacobson SS, Prescott B, et al. Women' s exper- iences during the first year following diagnosis of breast can- cer. Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research, 2002, 3 (1): 1-26.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Luutonen S, Vahlberg T, Eloranta S, et al. Breast cancer patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy: Distress, depressive symptoms and unmet needs of psychosocial support. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2011, 100: 299-303.
  • 2Cordova M, Giese-Davis J, Golant M, et al. Mood disturbance in community cancer support groups: The role of emotional suppression and fighting spirit. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2003, 55(5): 461-467.
  • 3Iwamitsu Y, Shimoda K, Abe H, et al. Anxiety, emotional suppression, and psychological distress before and after breast cancer diagnosis. Psychosomatics, 2005, 46(1): 19-24.
  • 4Ando N, Iwamitsu Y, Kuranami M, et al. Psychological characteristics and subjective symptoms as determinants of psychological distress in patients prior to breast cancer diagnosis. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2009, 17(11): 1361-1370.
  • 5Schlatter MC, Cameron LD. Emotional suppression tendencies as predictors of symptoms, mood, and coping appraisals during AC chemotherapy for breast cancer treatment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2010, 40(1): 15-29.
  • 6Giese-Davis J, Koopman C, Butler LD, et al. Change in emotion-regulation strategy for women with metastatic breast cancer following supportive-expressive group therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2002, 70(4): 916-925.
  • 7Bj?rneklett H, Rosenblad A, Lindemalm C, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized study of support group intervention in women with primary breast cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2013, 74(4): 346-353.
  • 8Watson M, Greer S. Development of a questionnaire measure of emotional control. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1983, 27(4): 299-305.
  • 9Ferrandis ED, Vaillo YA, Garrido MJG, et al. Emotional suppression and breast cancer: Validation research on the spanish adaptation of the Courtauld Emotional Control Scale (CECS). Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2010, 13(1): 406-417.
  • 10Yang HJ, Soong WT, Kuo PH, et al. Using the CES-D in a two-phase survey for depressive disorders among nonreferred adolescents in Taipei: a stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2004, 82(3): 419-430.

共引文献88

同被引文献876

引证文献84

二级引证文献689

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部