期刊文献+

微创扩张通道下椎间融合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎滑脱 被引量:2

Under the Expansion of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion Channel Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨微创扩张通道下椎间融合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定术在治疗腰椎滑脱疾病中的临床疗效。方法采用微创扩张通道下椎间融合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗腰椎滑脱12例,手术均在气管插管全身麻醉下进行,采用俯卧位,棘突旁作1~2 cm小切口,经微创扩张通道于椎间隙植入融合器植骨融合后,经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定提拉椎体复位。术后定期复查X线片以观察固定节段的稳定性和融合情况。结果术后12例全部获得随访,随访6~12个月,平均8个月。滑脱均完全复位,无植骨不融合。内固定节段稳定,腰椎椎间高度及生理曲度都得到良好重建及维持,未出现内固定断裂、松动及脱出,无血管、神经损伤等并发症。结论微创扩张通道下椎间融合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗腰椎滑脱,防止了棘突旁肌肉和韧带的剥离,完全恢复腰椎序列,复位良好,是一种积极有效的方法。 Objective Expansion of minimally invasive percutaneous interbody fusion under channel pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of spondylolisthesis in the clinical disease and application value. Methods Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion under expansion channel percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of spondylolisthesis in 12 cases,operations were carried out under general anesthesia,the prone position,spinous process for the 1 ~ 2 cm small incision,The minimally invasive expansion of the channel in the intervertebral fusion cage implantation after percutaneous pedicle screw fixation pulling vertebra reduction. After periodic review of X-ray film to observe the stability of a fixed segment,and fusion rate. Results After 12 cases were followed up for 6 to 12 months,an average of 8 months. Slippage are fully reset,no bone graft and fusion. Segmental fixation stability,lumbar intervertebral height and lordosis have been rebuilding and maintaining good,does not appear fracture fixation,loosening and extrusion,without blood vessels,nerve injury. Conclusion Under the expansion of minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion channel percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of spondylolisthesis,to prevent the spinous process of stripping the muscles and ligaments,lumbar sequence fully restored,good reduction,spinal compression before and after the party has been completely lifted,sliding out of line segment obtained immediately after the stable,low back muscle strength have been protected,can get out of bed early,to facilitate post-operative care and functional training,as a positive and effective ways.
作者 张东 陈敬忠
出处 《实用骨科杂志》 2016年第8期718-720,共3页 Journal of Practical Orthopaedics
关键词 腰椎 滑脱 微创 内固定 lumbar spondylolisthesis minimally invasive fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1kim Dy,Lee SH,Chung SK,ef al. Comparison of multifi-dus muscle atrophy and trunk extension musle strength:percuta-neous versus open pedicle screw fixation [ J ].Spine( phila pa 1976) ,2005,30(1):123-129.
  • 2Kramer M ,Katzmaier P,Eisele K^et ol. Surface electro-myogra-phy-verifird muscular damage associated withthe open dorsal approach to the lumbar spine [ J ]. EurSpine J,2001 ,10(5) :414420.
  • 3王洪伟,周跃,李长青,赵卫东.经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的生物力学及临床研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2011,31(9):932-937. 被引量:72
  • 4王建,周跃,初同伟,张正丰,王卫东,李长青.经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折[J].中华创伤杂志,2009,25(3):223-226. 被引量:33
  • 5Lowe TG,Yahemia AD. Unilateral transforaminal poste-rior lumbar interbody fusion [ J ]. Clin Orthop RelatRes,2002(394) :64-72.
  • 6Hunt T, Francis HS, Christopher IS^et al. Contralateralradiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fu-sion [J]. Eur Spine J,2007,16(3) :311-314.
  • 7Bagan B’Nimesh P, Harel D, et al. Complications ofminimally invasive surgery ( MIS) :comparison of mini-mally invasive and open interhody fusion techniques[J].Spine,2006,31(6):83.
  • 8Rovner J, James S, Kevin M yet al. A comparison of in-fection rates in minimally invasive vs. open TIJFs : asingle surgeon retrospective review[ J ] . Spine,2008 ,33(8):9-1().
  • 9Foley KT, Gupta SK. Percutaneous pedicle secre fixa-tion of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results[J]. J Neurosurg,2002 ,97( 1 suppl) :7-12.
  • 10周雷杰,雷村,黄燎原,徐荣明,杨立峰.微创经皮Sextent固定系统治疗腰椎骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(3):217-218. 被引量:12

二级参考文献25

  • 1周雷杰,雷村,黄燎原,徐荣明,杨立峰.微创经皮Sextent固定系统治疗腰椎骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(3):217-218. 被引量:12
  • 2李勤,田伟,刘波,胡临,李志宇,袁强.导航辅助微创经皮穿刺椎弓根内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效观察[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(19):1339-1341. 被引量:16
  • 3Foley KT, Gupta SK. 802 percutaneous pedicle screw- rod fixation of the lumbar spine . Neurosurg, 2001,49(2) :536 -537.
  • 4Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, et al. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J, 1994, 3 (2) : 184 -201.
  • 5Siebenga J, Leferink VJ, Segers M J, et al. Treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures: a muhicenter prospective randomized study of operative versus nonsurgieal treatment. Spine, 2006, 31 (25) :2881 -2890.
  • 6Verlaan JJ, Diekerhof CH, Buskens E, et al. Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine : a systematic review of the literature on techniques, complications, and outcome. Spine, 2004, 29(7):803-814.
  • 7Rampersaud YR, Annand N, Dekutoski MB. Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in the Management of Thoracolumbar Trauma : Current Concepts. Spine, 2006, 31 ( 11 S) : S96 - S102.
  • 8Assaker R. Minimal access spinal technologies : state - of - the - art, indications, and techniques. Joint Bone Spine, 2004, 71 (6) :459 -469.
  • 9Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine, 2005, 30 ( 1 ) : 123 - 129.
  • 10Ringel F, Stoffel M, Stuer C, et al. Minimally invasive transmuscular pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery, 2006, 59(4):361 -367.

共引文献107

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部