摘要
民生问题涉及的领域广泛而复杂,如教育、就业、收入分配、社会保障等等,这些都与行政法治的时代精神和政府职能转变有着密不可分的关系,是行政法无法回避的问题。我国民生问题立法从传统上讲,具有行政高权主导的特性,这种以行政系统为主体和主导的模式有自身的优势,但同时也存在明显不足,这制约了民生问题立法的法治化。如何挖掘行政法中的民生问题立法资源,如何通过行政法拓展民生问题立法的内容、范畴和技术等,需要给出立法回答。总体上讲,应当沿着这样的思路展开,一是从理论上有一个认知,必须意识到我国目前的民生问题立法没有很好地从行政法吸取相关的资源和养分。二是形成一个方案,通过行政法的相关原理、相关制度、相关技术,拓展民生问题立法。三是确定相应的义务主体,由该义务主体综合考量民生问题立法吸收行政法资源的问题。通过对我国民生问题立法及其技术进行深层次的调整,将现今民生问题立法体系整合的零散性、部类分布的非均衡性、典则构型的不完整性以及覆盖事域的模糊性一揽子予以解决。
Livelihood issues involve multiple complex fields,including education,employment,income distribution and social security.These issues,which cannot be evaded,are closely related to the Zeitgeist of the administrative rule of law and to changes in governmental functions.Traditionally,Chinese legislation on livelihood issues was dominated by administration,which served as the driving force and leading model.This model had its advantages,but at the same time it has obvious deficiencies that have kept legislation on livelihood issues from developing toward the rule of law.We need a legislative answer to the questions of finding legislative resources for livelihood issues in administrative law and of expanding the contents,categories and techniques of legislation on livelihood issues through administrative law.In general,we should adopt the approach of developing the following:firstly,a theoretical understanding and awareness that current Chinese legislation on livelihood issues fails to have a good grasp of the relevant resources or nutrients in administrative law;secondly,aplan for expanding legislation on livelihood issues by means of the relevant principles,institutions and techniques of administrative law;and thirdly,corresponding responsible bodies to comprehensively consider the question of exploiting administrative law resources in legislation on livelihood issues.An in-depth adjustment of Chinese legislation on livelihood issues and techniques will enable us to develop apackage that will solve the fragmentary nature,partial distribution,imperfect normative configuration and vagueness of areas covered under the current system of legislation on livelihood issues.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第8期117-138,207,共22页
Social Sciences in China
