社会化媒体的“中国式反腐”——对落马官员案微博讨论的社会网络分析被引量：6

Chinese Anti-corruption in Social Media:A Social Network Analysis of Discussions over the Corrupt Officials on Microblogs

原文传递

导出

摘要十八大以来,反腐败成为中国政治的重要议题。社会化媒体能否促进公民政治参与,构建反腐公共领域?本文通过对六位落马官员案微博讨论质量的分析,发现官方媒体是最具影响力的微博意见领袖;微博空间存在明显的"反腐信息沟";信息流向受官员级别影响;讨论停留于官员个人难以抵达制度建设,愉悦是主要的情绪表达。因此社会化媒体难以形成统合的反腐意见市场,而是离散化的空间,在中国现有的制度背景和转型社会实践中,这也是"中国式反腐"投射于网络的特有景观。 Anti-corruption has become an important issue of Chinese politics since the 18 th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. Do social media have the power of engaging citizens in politics and constructing a public anti-corruption space? From analyzing the discussion quality of cases on the six corrupt officials, this paper finds that official media is the most influential opinion leader on microblogs; there exist obvious 'anti-corruption information' gap on microblogs; information diffusion is subject to the rank of the officials; the movement-like anti-corruption on microblogs has difficulty in reaching the system level instead of personal level, and pleasure is the main emotion in news discourses. Generally speaking, social media are more like a discrete space rather than a convergence space for expressing anti-corruption ideas. This is also a unique feature of 'Chinese Anti-corruption' reflected on the cyberspace in the transforming process of Chinese society.

作者吴瑛宋韵雅刘勇

机构地区上海外国语大学新闻传播学院香港浸会大学新闻系山西省临汾市水土保持科学研究所

出处《新闻大学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期104-113,128,共11页 Journalism Research

基金国家社科基金项目(14BGJ059) 北京外国语大学中国文化走出去协同创新中心项目(XTCX150615) 上海外国语大学青年教师科研创新团队资助

关键词微博反腐公共领域意见领袖落马官员 Anti-corruption via microblogs public sphere opinion leader corrupt officials

分类号 G210 [文化科学—新闻学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献48

1Ko, K., & Weng, C., "Critical Review of Conceptual Definitions of Chinese Corruption: a formal-legal perspective" , Journal of Contemporary China 20 (2011) : pp. 359-378.
2Huntington, S. P., PoliticalOrder in Changing Societies, (New Haven:Yale University Press, 1968) :p. 59.
3Mayfield, A. , What is Social Media (New York:iCrossing, 2010) :pp. 5-6.
4Dion Hinchcliffe, https://dionhinchcliffe, com/2007/01/29/social-media-goes-mainstream, 20070129/20160412.
5Best S.J.& Krueger B.S, "Analyzing the Representativeness of Internet Political Participation" . Political Behavior 27 (2005) : pp. 183-215.
6Gil de Zuniga, H., dung, N., & Valenzuela, S. , "Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation, ", Journal of Computer - Mediated Communication 17(2012) :pp. 319-336.
7Vitak J, Zube P, Smock A et al, "It' s Complicated: Faeebook Users' Political Participation in the 2008 Election" , Cyberpsychology Behavior And Social Nerworking, 14(2011) :pp. 107-114.
8Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., & Carpini, M. X. D., Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America(Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2009):p. 10.
9Pan Z., Kosicki G.M., "Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation" , Reese S.D., Gandy Jr O.H., Grant A. E. Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World(New Jersey: Lawrence Erlhaum Associates, 2011) :p. 35-66.
10Ludes, P., Convergence and Fragmentation: Media Technology and the lnformation Society, (Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 2008) :p. 9.