期刊文献+

经营者集中反垄断审查之皇冠宝石规则研究 被引量:4

An Analysis on the Crown Jewel Rule in Merger Control
原文传递
导出
摘要 皇冠宝石规则是欧美经营者集中反垄断审查制度中的具体规则。在执法机构认为当事方提交的救济方案执行风险不可接受的情况下,适用皇冠宝石规则有利于打破救济商谈僵局,促使执法机构附条件批准经营者集中而不是简单禁止,同时确保当事方承诺的救济方案得以实施,避免排除和限制市场竞争的效果发生。商务部公布的附条件批准案已有适用类似皇冠宝石规则的先例,新近颁布的《反垄断法》配套规章也将皇冠宝石规则纳入其中。以此为契机全面梳理皇冠宝石规则的国外做法,深入探讨规则的性质和价值争论,比较研究类似规则,借鉴国外做法并结合我国执法实际提出构建我国相关规则的设想,能为我国反垄断立法和执法提供更坚实的实务和理论支撑。 "Crown jewel" remedies, as used in merger control in the U.S. and the EU, can be em- ployed to break deadlock in remedy negotiations when the antitrust authorities perceive implementation risks associated with remedy plans proposed by the parties as too high. The option enables the authorities to reach a conditional clearance decision instead of simply blocking a transaction, and to implement the attached conditions effectively, thus avoids the effects of eliminating or restricting competition. The Min- istry of Commerce of China has adopted remedy measures similar to the rule of Crown Jewels in some of its conditional clearance decisions, a practice that has been incorporated into an implementing regulation recently issued. In this context, the article aims to conduct an extensive review of Crown Jewel Rule a- dopted in foreign jurisdictions, survey discussions on the nature of crown jewel rule, and compare similar rules in order to making proposals on its design based on foreign experience and law enforcement in China, and to providing practical and theoretical support for further improvement of China's antimonopoly law.
作者 叶军
机构地区 商务部反垄断局
出处 《中外法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期1057-1082,共26页 Peking University Law Journal
关键词 反垄断 经营者集中 皇冠宝石规则 替代剥离 Anti-- Monopoly Concentration between Undertakings The Rules of Crown Jewels Al-ternative Divestiture
  • 相关文献

参考文献95

  • 1商务部反垄断局网站:http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/b/c/201412/20141200835207.shtml.
  • 2商务部公告2010年第41号《关于实施经营者集中资产或业务剥离的暂行规定》,参见商务部反垄断局网站:http://fldj.mofcom.gov.cn/article/c/201007/201.0707012.00.shtml.
  • 3商务部反垄断局网站:http://fldj.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/ztxx/2.0904/20090406198805.html.
  • 4商务部反垄断局官方网站:http://fldj.roofcorn.gov.cn/article/ztxx/201304/20130400091222.shtml.
  • 5叶军.先行修正和买家前置规则比较研究[J].中外法学,2015,27(1):130-150. 被引量:5
  • 6《关于救济措施的通告(2001年)》.
  • 7陶琦.皇冠明珠条款——欧美实践与中国移植[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2012,27(6):83-89. 被引量:4
  • 8European Commission, Merger Remedies Study (Public version), DG COMP, October 2005, p.52.
  • 9Merger Remedies: Competition Commission Guidelines, (2008), para. 3.13 and 3.14.
  • 10Barbara A. Clark, "Merger investigations at the Federal Trade Commission: An Insider's view", 56 Antitrust Law Journal, 776--777(1987).

二级参考文献154

  • 1《试行规定》第7条.
  • 2Staff of the Bureau of Competition of the Federal Trade Commission, A Study of the Commission's Divestiture Process, 1999.
  • 3EC, Commission notice on remedies acceptable under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 and under Commission Regulation (EC) No 802/2004,2008.
  • 4U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division, Antitrust Division Policy Guide to Merger Remedies, October 2004.
  • 5Staff of the Bureau of Competition of the Federal Trade Commission, A Study of the Commission's Divestiture Process,1999.
  • 6William J. Baer, Reflection on 20 Years of Merger Enforcement Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, Washington D.C., October 29, 1996, http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/hearings/single_firm/bio,223051.htm,最后访问日期:2012年6月29日.
  • 7Carl Shapiro and Michael Sohn, Aticle and Feature: Merger Consent Decrees: "Crown Jewel" Provision in Merger Consent Decrees, 1997 American Bar Association Antitrust, 1997.
  • 8Ford Motor Co., 405 U.S. at 573; United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co,. 366 U.S. 316,326(1961).
  • 9Frequently Asked Questions about Merger Consent Order Provision, http://www.ftc.gov/bc/mergerfaq.shtm#CrownJewels,最后访问日期:2012年6月29日.
  • 10Competition Commission, Merger Remedies: Competition Commission Guidelines, November 2008.

共引文献11

同被引文献46

引证文献4

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部