期刊文献+

中美农业智库行为比较研究 被引量:11

Comparative Study on the Behavior of Chinese and American Agricultural Think Tanks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]中外智库比较研究是智库研究中的一个重要方面,不同社会文化背景、管理体制和运行机制下智库行为的比较,对中国智库未来发展借鉴国际经验具有重要意义。[方法/过程]选择中美两国不同类型的农业类智库作为典型案例,从科研学术、政策咨询、社会舆论、合作交流四个方面,对比分析中美智库的行为,由此透视中美智库发展的差异性和规律特征。[结果/结论]发现中美两国科研院所类智库的学术行为都比大学附属型智库活跃;布鲁金斯学会的科研学术行为和政策咨询行为最为活跃;与美国相比,中国智库的政策咨询行为的影响力存在较大差距;美国民间智库更加注重与媒体的沟通和联系,通过各种途径来扩展自身的合作交流网络。最后讨论了美国经验对中国智库建设的建议,以及中美智库行为比较研究的未来。 [ Purpose/Significance ] Comparative study between different countries is an important aspect of the research of think tank. Thecomparison of behavior of think tank under the different social cultural background, management system and operation mechanism has greatsignificance for the think tanks of China to draw a lesson from international experience. [ Method/Process] Selecting different types of ag-ricultural think tanks in China and America as a typical case, this paper conducts a comparative study of the activities differences of thinktanks in China and America from the aspects of academic research, policy advice, social public opinion, and cooperation, thus to study thedifferences of the development and the characteristics of think tanks in the two countries. [ Result/Conclusion I It is found that academicbehavior of the institutes in China and the United States think tank are more active than the university affiliated ones; the academic behaviorand policy advising behavior of Brookings Institution are the most active ; there is a big gap between the American think tanks and the Chi-nese think tanks" policy consulting behavior influence; folk think tanks in America pay more attention to the media, and will proactivelysearch for more communication and contact opportunities via various ways to expand its cooperation and exchanges in the network. Final-ly, the recommendations for the construction of China think tanks based on the American experience are presented, and the future of thecomparative study of the behavior of Chinese and American think tanks is discussed.
作者 梁丽 张学福 Liang Li Zhang Xuefu(The College of Economics and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866 Institute of Agricultural Information, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081)
出处 《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第10期26-31,共6页 Journal of Intelligence
基金 中国农业科学院科技创新工程项目"农业知识组织与知识挖掘团队" 辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目"辽宁省农业智库及其合作交流网络研究"(编号:L15CTQ003) 辽宁省教育科研管理智库项目"辽宁省高校科研机构合作交流网络研究"(编号:ZK2015093)
关键词 智库 农业智库 智库行为 中国 美国 think tank agricultural think tank think tank behavior China America
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献59

  • 1张继业.美国的“思想库”[J].思想政治工作研究,2002(3):41-41. 被引量:1
  • 2夏广军,徐红艳.浅谈高等农业院校服务"三农"模式[J].农业科技管理,2005,24(1):31-32. 被引量:14
  • 3朱旭峰.“思想库”研究:西方研究综述[J].国外社会科学,2007(1):60-69. 被引量:59
  • 4[美]托马斯·戴伊:《自上而下的政策制定》,鞠方安等译,中国人民大学出版社2002年版,第201页.
  • 5王辉耀.中国需要民间智库.中国经济信息,2010,(6):43-44.
  • 6王振 张越杰.关于加快我国农业信息化建设的思考.决策与信息,2010,(7):7-9.
  • 7[英]布赖恩·麦克奈尔:《政治传播学引论》,殷祺译,新华出版社2005年版,第25页.
  • 8James S. Influencing government policy making [ R ].// Stone D. Banking on Knowledge : The Genesis of the Global Development Network. Warwick, 2000.
  • 9Nathan Associates Inc. Policy analysis units in developing countries. A discussion paper submitted to USAID [ R ]. Washington, DC, 2004.
  • 10Stone D, Denham A, Garnett M. Think Tanks Across Nations: A Comparative Approach [ M ]. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998.

共引文献232

同被引文献86

引证文献11

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部