基于社交网络的群组式阅读推广模式研究被引量：8

Research on the Model of Group Reading Promotion Based on Social Network Group

导出

摘要 [目的 /意义]基于社交网络开展群组式阅读推广,有利于扩大社交网络对阅读的积极功效,实现读者系统性、深层次、有意义的阅读。[方法 /过程]对基于社交网络的群组式阅读推广的内涵意蕴、环境构成要素、实现策略进行论述,并在阅读推广过程中,对该模式进行实践应用。[结果 /结论]案例研究显示:基于社交网络开展群组式阅读推广具有提高读者阅读成绩与思维层次,增强阅读主体意识及交互激励行为的应用效果。 [ Purpose/significance] Based on social network to carry out group reading promotion, which helps to expand the positive effect of social network to read, realize systematic, deep and meaningful reading. [ Method/process ] This paper has carried out an analysis of the connotation meaning, environmental factors and implementation strategies in group reading promotion. And on the basis of the analysis results, in the process of actual reading promotion, this model has been used. [ Result/conclusion] Case study shows that： reading promotion based on social network group improved the readers＇ reading performance and thinking level, and enhanced the readers＇ subject behavior and interactive motivation.

作者张泸月

机构地区四川师范大学图书馆

出处《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第17期53-58,共6页 Library and Information Service

基金 2015年度四川省教育厅科研项目"‘全民阅读’背景下高校图书馆促进大学生开展深度阅读的激励机制研究"(项目编号:15SB0035)研究成果之一

关键词社交网络服务阅读推广群组模式成效分析 social network service reading promotion group pattern effectiveness analysis

分类号 G252.1 [文化科学—图书馆学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1调查显示国民阅读率上升[EB/OL].[2016-04-201.http://learning.sohu.corn/20160420/n445087328.shtml.
2WHITE J, HUNGERFORD-KRESSER H. Character journaling through social networks[ J]. Journal of adolescent & adult literacy, 2014,57(8) :642-654.
3TAMIR D, BRICKER A, DODELLFEDER D,et al. Reading fic- tion and reading minds: the role of simulation in the default net- work [ J ]. Social cognitive & affective neuroscience,2016, 1 1 (2) : 215 -224.
4WAUMANS M, NICODEME T, BERSIN1 H. Topology analysis of social networks extracted from literature[ J]. PLOS one,2015,10 (6) :1 -30.
5KOCHTCHI A, LESBERGER T, BIEMAMM C. Networks of names: visual exploration and semi-automatic tagging of social net- works from newspaper articles [ J ]. Computer graphics forum, 2014,33(33) :211 -200.
6LIU C, CHEN M, TSENG C. Incrests: towards real-time incre- mental short text summarization on comment streams from social network services[ J]. IEEE transactions on knowledge & data engi- neering,2015,27 ( 11 ) :2986 - 3000.
7FOX J, ANDEREGG C. Romantic relationship stages and social networking sites: uncertainty redaction strategies and pereeived re- lational norms on facebook[ J]. Cyberpsyehology behavior & social networking,2014,17 ( 11 ) :685 - 691.
8ASTERHAN C, HEVER R. Learning from reading argumentive group discussions in facebook: rhetoric style matters (again)[ J ]. Computers in human behavior,2015 (53) :570 - 576.
9TAVAKOLI-TABA S, HOSSAIN L, HEARD R, et al. Personal and network dynamics in performance of knowledge workers: a study of Australian breast radiologists [ J ]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (2) :1 - 15.
10SESEK L, PUSNIK M. Reading popular literature and digital media: reading experience, fandoms, and social networks [ J ]. Anthropological notebooks ,2014,20 ( 2 ) : 103 - 126.