期刊文献+

对基因编辑技术伦理争议的思考 被引量:6

Thinking of Gene Editing Technology Ethical Controversy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前,运用CRISPR基因编辑技术修饰人类胚胎基因的研究引发了学界关于技术伦理的争议。本文从争议的事由、原因、观点及实质入手,反思了CRISPR基因编辑技术应用可能产生的后果,分析了现代技术责任伦理的时代需求。最后,本文提出了基因编辑技术应用需要有明确的责任伦理主体,有效的伦理监管和伦理监督机制,以及加快基因编辑技术伦理规范建设的具体举措。 The research of using the CRISPR gene editing technique to modify human embryo leads to some ethical controversies.The paper explores the origin,reasons,viewpoint and its essence of the controversy and reflects on the possible consequences,which highlight the demand of modern technology responsibility ethics.To do this,the application of the gene editing technology needs to have a clear responsibility ethics subject,effective supervision and ethical supervision mechanism,and concrete measures to speed up the construction of gene editing technology ethics.
作者 艾凉琼
出处 《科学与社会》 CSSCI 2016年第3期53-59,共7页 Science and Society
关键词 基因编辑技术 责任伦理 人类胚胎基因 伦理争议 gene editing technique responsibility ethics human embryonic genes technology ethical controversy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1On human gene editing: International summit statement :Dec. 3rd, 2015. http://www8. nationalacademies, org/onpinews/newsitem, aspx? RecordID= 12032015a. [2016- 04- 10].
  • 2John Travis. Inside the summit on human gene editing: A reporter's notebook,Dec. 4, 2015. http://www, sciencemag, org/news/2015/12/inside-summit human-gene-editing- reporter-s-notebook[2016-04-12].
  • 3张旭.技术时代的责任伦理学:论汉斯·约纳斯[J].中国人民大学学报,2003,17(2):66-71. 被引量:64
  • 4陈凡,赵迎欢.论基因技术共同体的社会责任[J].科学学研究,2005,23(3):325-329. 被引量:4
  • 5田晓山,袁洪,欧阳冬生.“黄金大米”事件的反思——用科学理性和道德规范做好伦理审查[J].中国医学伦理学,2013,26(1):17-20. 被引量:2
  • 6David Cyranoski, Sara Reardon. Chinese scientists genetically modify human embryos. Na- ture/news, 22 April 2015. http://www, nature, com/news/chinese-scientists-genetically- modify-human-embryos-1. 17378. [2016-04-18].
  • 7Eidi Ledford . Where in the world could the first CRISPR baby be born. Nature/News Feature, 13 October 2015. http://www, nature, com/news/where-in-the-world-could-the- first-crispr-bahy-be-born-1. 18542. [2016-04-18].

二级参考文献21

  • 1陈凡.论技术主体的社会化[J].自然辩证法研究,1995,11(9):35-42. 被引量:2
  • 2Bennet W,Gurin G. Sciencl that frightens scientists: The great debate over DNA Analitic[J]. Boston,1997,239(2):49.
  • 3Hans Jonas. Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik Fur die technologische Zivilisation[M]. rankfurt/Main, 1979.
  • 4J.C. Wolf. Hans Jonas : Eine naturphilosophische Begrundung der Ethik[A]. A. Hugli & P. Lubcke. Philosophie im 20. Jahrhundert[ C]. Reinbek Verlag, 1996.
  • 5Wolfgang Schluehter. Conviction and Responsibility[A]. Padadox of Modernity: Culture and Conduct in the Theory of Max Weber [ C]. trans, by Nell Solomon, California,Stanford University Press, 1996.
  • 6Hans Jonas. Macht oder Ohnmacht der Subjekfivtat:Das Leib-Seele-Problem im Vorfdd des Prinzips Verantwortung[ M]. Frankfurt/Main, Insd Verlag, 1987.
  • 7Franz Josef Wetz. Hans Jonas zur Einfuhrumg [ M ]. Hamburg: Junius Verlag, 1994.12.
  • 8Hans Jonas. Dem bosen Ende naher. Gesprach tiber das Verhaltnis des Menschen zur Natur [ M ]. Hrsg.Wolfgang Schneider. Frankfurt/Main, Suhrkamp Verlag,1993. 102.
  • 9Hans Jonas. Wissenschaft als personliches Erlebnis[M]. Gottingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Verlag, 1987.19.
  • 10Hans Jonas. Teehnik, Medizin und Ethik: ZurPraxis des Pfinzips Verantwortung[ M ]. Frankfurt/Main, Insel Verlag. 1985.

共引文献67

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部