期刊文献+

建构主义教学理论之科学性探讨 被引量:36

The Study of the Scientific Nature of Constructivist Instructional Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2006年,基尔希纳(Kirschner)等人发表论文从人的认知架构角度论证直导教学的优越性,对建构主义教学理论的合理性发起了挑战。信息时代的到来意味着学习者将面临各种非良构情境的挑战,建构主义教学方式在此担当重任。依据社会科学的重要属性,我们可以从累积性、确证度和情境性视角来探讨建构主义教学理论的科学性,并且进一步分析业界有关"先教后学"与"先学后教"、"聚焦内容"与"聚焦技能"以及"学习理论"与"教学理论"的学术论辩。实际上,提出"学教统一、扶放有度"的原则也许能够为完善建构主义理论之科学性开启新的思路。 In 2006, Kirschner, Sweller and Clark published a paper discussing the advantages of guided instruction from the perspective of cognitive architecture of human being, challenging the rationality of constructivist instructional theory. With the coming of information era, learners are facing various challenges of ill-structured situation. The constructivist instructional approaches play important role in such situation. According to the important properties of social science, we can elaborate the scientific nature of constructivist instruction from the perspective of cumulative nature, validity, and situational contexts. Further, we can also analyze the academic debates on "teaching first and learning later" vs. "learning first and teaching later", "content-centered" vs. "skills-centered", and "learning theory" vs. "teaching theory". We thus propose the principle of "integrating teaching and learning with proper scaffolding", which might be a new approach to improving the scientific nature of eonstructivist theory.
作者 钟丽佳 盛群力 ZHONG Li-jia SHENG Qun-li
出处 《电化教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第10期22-28,共7页 E-education Research
基金 2016年度教育部人文社科一般规划项目"学习科学视域下教学设计理论发展研究--促进高阶能力的学习环境设计"(项目编号:16YJA880033)
关键词 建构主义 科学性 非良构情境 从扶到放 Constructivism Scientific Nature Ill-structured Situation Scaffolding
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1杜祖贻.社会科学的科学本质[M].洪光磊,李敏谊,译.上海:上海辞书出版社,2012.
  • 2Van Joolingen, W. R., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Manlove, S.. Co-Lab: Research and Development of An Online Learning Environment for Collaborative Scientific Discovery Learning[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2005, (21):671- 688.
  • 3Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Dugnid, P.. Situated Cognition and the Cuhure of Learning [J]. Edueational Researcher, 1989, (18) :32- 42.
  • 4Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. (Eds.). Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation [M]. Englewood, NJ- Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
  • 5Von Glasersfeld, E.. Homage to Jean Piaget[J]. Irish Journal of Psychology, 1997, (18) :293-306.
  • 6Sehuell, T. J.. The Role of the Student in Learning from Instrnetion[J]. Contemporary Educational Psyehology, 1988, (13):276-295.
  • 7Lillard, A., & Else-Quest, N.. Evaluating Montessori Edueation[J]. Science,2006, (313):1893-1894.
  • 8Russell, S. H., Haneoek, M.P., & MeCullough, J.. Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences [J]. Seienee,2007, (316):548- 549.
  • 9Klahr, D., & Nigam, M.. The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction : Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning[J]. Psychological Science, 2004, (15) : 661-667.
  • 10Sigmund Tobias. & Tomas, M. Duffy. Constrnetivist Instruction: Success or Failure[M]. New York: Roudedge, 2009:47,188.

二级参考文献23

共引文献30

同被引文献306

引证文献36

二级引证文献169

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部