摘要
通过分析大型汽轮发电机失磁故障时机端阻抗变化与功率输出变化,比较两种失磁保护方案:阻抗原理和逆无功原理失磁保护。经过比较发现两种保护原理主判据实质上相同,信号出口方式相同。针对逆无功原理失磁保护定值整定没有导则问题,提出阻抗动作边界映射至P-Q平面方法,确定发电机失磁故障时功率动作边界。克服逆无功原理失磁保护逆无功定值依靠工程经验整定困难,进一步提高保护定值整定可靠性。以一台1 000 MW汽轮发电机参数作为计算实例,计算两种保护原理的保护定值,为双重化双原理失磁保护配置提供具体参考。
This paper compares the two criterions of generator loss-of-excitation protection based on impedance principle and inverse reactive power principle, by analyzing the variation of the steam turbine generator＇s power output and generator-end impedance. The main criterions of the two protection principles are demonstrated the same principle and trip mode. The main action area of loss-of-excitation protection based on impedance principle is mapped from impedance plane to P-Q plane, in order to get the power action area. The function can save the setting calculation of the latter one from engineering experience. Finally, taking a 1 000 MW steam turbine generator as an example, the setting calculation of the two kinds of protection principles are calculated, which provides a specific reference for the dual principle loss-of-excitation protection configuration.
出处
《电力系统保护与控制》
EI
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第20期154-159,共6页
Power System Protection and Control
关键词
汽轮发电机
失磁保护
阻抗原理
逆无功原理
定值整定
steam turbine generator
loss-of-excitation protection
impedance principle
inverse reactive power principle
setting calculation
