期刊文献+

超声检查对乳腺良恶性病变患者的鉴别诊断价值分析 被引量:1

Value of Ultrasound Examination for the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声检查对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2015年12月期间我院收治的242例乳腺病变患者的临床资料,所有患者均给予彩色超声检查,以病理学诊断结果为金标准,分析超声对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值。结果病理学诊断结果显示恶性病变54例、良性病变188例,超声检查诊断的敏感度、特异度、准确度分别为90.74%、92.55%、91.77%,超声检查结果与病理学诊断结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论超声检查可有效鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性病变,且具有良好的敏感度、特异度、准确度,可作为有效可靠的检查方式,值得临床进一步推广。 Objective To discuss the value of ultrasound examination for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Methods The clinical data of 242 cases of patients with breast lesions admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were given color Doppler ultrasound examination. With pathological results as the gold standard, the value of ultrasound examination for differential diagnosis was analyzed. Results The pathological diagnosis showed 54 cases of malignant lesions and 188 cases of benign lesions; The diagnostic results of ultrasound had no statistical difference with pathological results (P〉0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasound were 90.74%, 92.55% and 91.77% respectively. Conclusions Ultrasound examination is effective in differentiate diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. It has good sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, and can be used as an effective and reliable way of examination.
出处 《临床医学工程》 2016年第10期1292-1293,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 超声检查 乳腺良恶性病变 鉴别诊断 准确度 Ultrasound examination Benign and malignant breast lesions Differential diagnosis Accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献82

  • 1罗志琴,方向明,褚文元.乳腺单纯性囊肿的钼靶X线影像分析[J].实用放射学杂志,2005,21(6):645-647. 被引量:6
  • 2茅瑾瑜,朱雪萍,章丽洁,徐君镛,朱世亮.乳腺导管内乳头状瘤的高频彩色多普勒超声检查[J].肿瘤,2006,26(1):90-92. 被引量:16
  • 3李洪林,姜玉新,郝玉芝,周纯武.超声对乳腺恶性病变的诊断价值[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(6):870-872. 被引量:56
  • 4赵斌,王光彬.重视MRI在乳腺疾病中的重要作用[J].医学影像学杂志,2007,17(2):109-110. 被引量:11
  • 5徐联国,任秀丽.浅谈高频彩色多普勒超声对乳腺结节病变的临床价值[J].中国保健营养(上旬刊),2014,24(3):1764-1765.
  • 6Lin X, Wang J, Han F, et al. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound . Eur J Radiol, 2012,8l (5) :873-878.
  • 7Morrow M, Strom E A, Bassett L W, et al. Standard for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS)[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2002,52(5) :256--276.
  • 8Pape-Zambito D, Jiang Z, Wu H,et al. Identifying a highly-ag- gressive DCIS subgroup by studying intra-individual DCIS hetero- geneity among invasive breast cancer patients [J]. PLoS one, 2014,9(6) : e100488.
  • 9Luparia A, Mariscotti G, Durando M,et al. Accuracy of tumour size assessment in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: com- parison o digital mammography, tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MRI[J]. Radiol Med, 2013,118(7) :1119--1136.
  • 10Heusinger K, Lohberg C, Lux M, et al. Assessment of breast cancer tumor size depends on method, histopathology and tumor sizeitself[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2005,94(1):17 23.

共引文献55

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部