摘要
目的检验Buss-Perry攻击问卷在中国军人群体中应用的信效度,并进行修订。方法采用分层随机抽样方法抽取553名军人作为受试对象,完成Buss-Perry攻击问卷。对样本进行编号后,奇数组（n=277）被用于探索性因素分析以确认因子结构;偶数组（n=276）被用于对所得维度进行验证性因素分析。抽取其中某个部队的89名军人于初评后2周进行重测。结果通过探索性因素分析,得到由身体攻击性、言语攻击性、愤怒、敌意4个分量表（共24个项目）构成的中国军人版Buss-Perry攻击性量表（CS-BPAQ）;验证性因素分析显示数据拟合良好[拟合优度指数（GFI）=0.864,相对拟合指数（RFI）=0.796,比较拟合指数（CFI）=0.732,近似误差均方根（RMSEA）=0.062];总量表的内部一致性Cronbach’sα系数为0.88,4个分量表的α系数为0.76～0.88;总量表的重测信度为0.94,4个分量表的重测信度为0.75～0.93。结论修订后的CS-BPAQ具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于中国军人的攻击性测量。
[Objective]To test the reliability and validity of Buss-erry aggression questionnaire（BPAQ） application to Chinese soldiers and revise it. [Methods]A total of 553 soldiers were selected by stratified random sampling method as samples,then completed the BPAQ. The sample was divided into odd group and even group. The odd array（n=277） was used for exploratory factor analysis（EFA）to ascertain the factor structure of questionnaire,while the even group（n=276）was used for confirmative factor analysis（CFA）for the resulting dimension. 89 soldiers in an army were selected to retest 2 weeks later. [Results]Through EFA,4 subscales（24 items）,namely ＂physical aggression＂,＂verbal aggression＂,＂anger＂,and ＂hostility＂,were extracted from BPAQ to develop a new model of Chinese soldier Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire（CS-BPAQ）. The CFA showed data fitting was good（GFI=0.864,RFI=0.796,CFI=0.732,RMSEA=0.062）. The cronbach ＇sαcoefficient of total scale was 0.88 and 4 subscales were 0.76～0.88. The retest reliability of the total scale was 0.94,4 subscales were 0.75-0.93.[Conclusion]The revised CS-BPAQ has good reliability and validity, which can be used to measure the aggression of Chinese soldiers..
出处
《职业与健康》
CAS
2016年第18期2540-2542,共3页
Occupation and Health
基金
全军"十二五"心理专项课题(12XLZ208)
关键词
中国军人
攻击性量表
信度
效度
Chinese soldier
Scale
Aggression
Reliability
Validity
