摘要
一般来说,史学比自然科学更受制于社会的变动和意识形态状况。20世纪90年代初的俄罗斯历史学较之其他学科更大程度上承受了国家巨变的后果,许多特征反映出所处"过渡时期"的时代影响。这一时期的俄罗斯史学不仅承载了苏联解体的所有社会反映,而且折射出俄罗斯的历史科学发展方向。其领域的"档案革命"、"教育革命"与"方法论革命"三个方面相互交织相互作用,共同构建着历史学的总体变局。
Generally speaking,historical study tends to subject to social changes and the changing social ideology more than the study of natural sciences. In the early 1990 s,Russian historiography reflected the fallout of the disastrous change then happening to the country,much more so than other academic disciplines. It bore characteristics that registered the specificity of the transition Russia was then going through in the period.The historiography of the period thus not only focused on reinterpreting Soviet history after the collapse of the Soviet Union but also offered new ideas for Russia's future development. In the main,the historiography of the period experienced 'the archival revolution,''the educational revolution'and 'the methodological revolution'; all those revolutions were intertwined and interacted,highlighting and contributing to the general change in historical study in Russia.
出处
《史学理论研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期113-120,共8页
Historiography Bimonthly
