期刊文献+

基于夏普利值的中压配电网扩建费用分摊方法 被引量:5

Distribution System Expansion Cost Allocation Based on Shapley Value
原文传递
导出
摘要 电力市场环境下配电网投资必须由接入其中的各方承担,公平合理的费用分摊方案是配电网健康有序发展的重要内容之一。提出一种基于夏普利值与最优潮流结合的费用分摊方法。首先借助最优潮流,确定在灵活可控配网中,由于分布式电源、负荷接入引起的最小扩建费用;再利用夏普利值对各方影响进行加权平均,进而确定费用分摊方案。以北京市延庆地区为蓝本设计算例进行验证,对一般负荷、电动汽车、光伏接入后各方所应承担的费用进行了分析。算例表明,所提方法能反映接入要素的类型、接入位置、容量、可控性等多个因素的影响。当接入方具有抑制主变过负载、电压越限、可灵活调节等属性时,可降低其接入费用,从而证明了该方法能够有效构成经济激励。 Investment of a distribution system must be allocated to system participants. Fair and reasonable cost allocation scheme is a key aspect towards a healthy distribution system. This paper proposes a cost allocation method based on Shapley Value method and optimal power flow. Firstly, optimal power flow determines minimum investment cost triggered by distributed generations and loads in controllable distribution system environment. Then Shapley Value method quantifies effect of each participant and allocates its responsibility. A case system is designed out of a real distribution system in Yanqing District, Beijing, where integration costs of conventional loads, electric vehicles and distributed solar generations are allocated. The case studies demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively reflect impact of location, capacity, controllability of loads and distributed generations. The participants relieving loading/voltage violations or having better controllability take less responsibility, thus share less cost. The case studies demonstrate effectiveness of the proposed method in constituting economical motivations.
出处 《电网技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第11期3322-3327,共6页 Power System Technology
基金 国家863高技术基金项目(2015AA050102) 国家自然科学基金项目(51177078) 国家电网公司科技项目(52020116000D)~~
关键词 固定成本 夏普利值 费用分摊 最优潮流 fixed cost Shapley Value cost allocation optimal power flow
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1邢海军,程浩忠,张沈习,张逸.主动配电网规划研究综述[J].电网技术,2015,39(10):2705-2711. 被引量:107
  • 2段登伟,刘俊勇,牛怀平,吴集光.基于标尺竞争模式的配电侧电力市场综述[J].电网技术,2005,29(8):8-13. 被引量:14
  • 3万国成,任震,张勇军.配电网中容量电费定价方法[J].电力系统自动化,2002,26(18):15-20. 被引量:5
  • 4苏娟,杜松怀,叶华.零售竞争市场配电网固定成本分摊方法研究[C]//中国高等学校电力系统及其自动化专业学术年会.长沙:长沙理工大学,2009:1-5.
  • 5Li F, Padhy N P, Wang J, et al. Cost-benefit reflective distribution Qharging methodology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(1): 58-64.
  • 6Soares T, Faria P, Vale Z, et al. Definition of distribution network tariffs considering distribution generation and demand response[C]//IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference. Chicago, USA: IEEE, 2014: 1-5.
  • 7Shapley L S. A value for n-person games[Z]. Contributions to the theory of games: Princeton University Press, 1953, 2: 307-317.
  • 8Junqueira M, Da Costa L C, Barroso LA, et al. An Aumann-Shapley approach to allocate transmission service cost among network users in electricitymarkets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2007, 22(4): 1532-1546.
  • 9Molina Y P, Saavedra O R, Amaris H. Transmission network cost allocation based on circuit theory and the Aumann-Shapley method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(4): 4568-4577.
  • 10Molina Y P, Prada R B, Saavedra O R. Complex losses allocation to generators and loads based on circuit theory and Aumann-Shapley Method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2010, 25(4): 1928-1936.

二级参考文献81

  • 1王先甲,梁劲,周静,周策.关于输配电企业对多类型用户的定价管制模型[J].中国电机工程学报,2004,24(10):40-44. 被引量:24
  • 2Rose K. The state of retail electricity markets in the U.S.[J]. The Electricity Journal, 2004, 17(1): 26-36.
  • 3Rudnick H, Zolezzi J. Electric sector deregulation and restructuring in Latin America: lessons to be learn and possible ways toward[J]. IEE Proc-Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2001, 148(2): 180-184.
  • 4Rudnick H, Donoso J. Integration of price cap and yardstick competition schemes in electrical distribution regulation[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2000, 15(4): 1428-1433.
  • 5Recordon E, Rudnick H. Distribution access pricing: application of the OFTEL rule to a yardstick competition scheme[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2002, 17(4): 1001-1007.
  • 6Lima J W M, Noronha J C C, Arango H et al. Distribution pricing based on yardstick regulation[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Systems,2002, 17(1): 198-204.
  • 7Viljainen S, Tahvanainen K, Lassila J et al. Regulation of electricity distributionbusiness [DB/OL]. http://powersystems.tkk.fi/nordac2004/papers/nordac2004_viljainen_et_al_paper. Pdf.
  • 8Office for Energy Regulation (Dtc). Yardstick competition regional electricity network companies, second regulatory period information and consultation document (English version) , Nov. 2002[DB/OL]. http://www.dte.nl/nl/Images/12_7073.pdf.
  • 9Kinnunenl K. Electricity network regulation practical implementation in the Nordic countries[DB/OL]. http://wip.tu-berlin.de/workshop/2002/papers/tu-berlin_wip_workshop_2002-paper_kinnunen-electricity_network_regulation.pdf.
  • 10Filippini M, Wild J. Regional differences in electricity distribution costs and their consequences for yardstick regulation of access prices[DB/OL]. http://www. cepe.ethz.ch/download/staff/joerg/lugano.pdf.

共引文献137

同被引文献61

引证文献5

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部