期刊文献+

达芬奇手术机器人:结直肠外科的新挑战 被引量:7

Da Vinci surgical robots:new challenges in colorectal surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 精准化微创手术已成为结直肠外科医疗水平的象征。达芬奇手术机器人系统的应运而生,开启了精准化微创手术的新纪元。该系统的优势在于:可提供高清稳定的立体视觉、精准化的直觉式动作控制、滤除的手部震颤、缩短的手术曲线以及可远程控制性。但其局限性在于:触觉反馈缺失,手术时间延长和价格昂贵等。笔者就达芬奇手术机器人系统的构成、发展史及其在结直肠外科手术中的应用现状进行阐述,并对这一先进智能技术的前景进行了些许思索。 Precise and minimally invasive surgery has become a yardstick that reflects the level of the technological advancement of colorectal surgery. As a result, the emergence of the da Vinci surgical system (DVSS) opened a new epoch for the precise and minimally invasive surgery. DVSS has the advantages of providing high definition and stable stereoscopic vision, accurate intuitive movement control, hand-tremor filtration, short learning curve and allowing remote manipulation, while, it also has shortcomings such as lack of force feedback, prolonged operative time and high cost. The authors, in this article, address the constitution and evolution of DVSS as well as its application state in colorectal surgery, and some considerations of the future prospects of advanced intelligent technology are also proposed.
出处 《中国普通外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期1494-1499,共6页 China Journal of General Surgery
关键词 结直肠外科手术 机器人手术 最小侵入性外科手术 综述文献 Colorectal Surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献61

  • 1Dimitrios Dimitroulis,Nikolaos Nikiteas,Theodore Troupis,Dimitrios Patsouras,Panayiotis Skandalakis,Gregory Kouraklis.Role of surgery in colorectal liver metastases:Too early or too late?[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(28):3484-3490. 被引量:5
  • 2Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2):69-90.
  • 3Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1994, 4(2):146-148.
  • 4Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Kuwabara K, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic or open distal gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 257(4):640-646.
  • 5Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P, et al. Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004, 77(2):745-753.
  • 6Lee J, Kim YM, Woo Y, et al. Robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with high body mass index: comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 7Zhou JF, Shi Y, Tang B, et al. Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of surgical performance and short-term outcomes[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(6):1779-1787.
  • 8Noshiro H, Ikeda O, Urata M. Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(4):1180-1187.
  • 9Kim HI, Park MS, Song KJ, et al. Rapid and safe learning of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis in a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2014, 40(10):1346-1354.
  • 10Hyun MH, Lee CH, KwonYJ, et al. Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20(4):1258-1265.

共引文献102

同被引文献66

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部