期刊文献+

念珠菌血症的菌种分布与诊疗进展 被引量:3

The species distribution of candidemia and the advances on diagnosis and treatment
原文传递
导出
摘要 临床上念珠菌血症发生率在不断升高,为临床治疗带来了严峻挑战。致病菌种以白念珠菌为主,同时近平滑念珠菌、热带念珠菌、光滑念珠菌等非白念珠菌的感染比率逐步上升。除血培养外,其他诊断方法如β-D-葡聚糖检测试验、PCR、抗原抗体反应等新诊断方法为初始的经验性治疗提供了帮助。针对菌种变化及耐药性问题,念珠菌血症首选棘白菌素类药物治疗,同时应关注抗真菌药物不规范应用的问题。 Candidemia is one of the challenges in clinical treatment because of the rising incidence rate. The most common pathogen of candidemia is C.albicans, in the same time incidence rate of non-C.a/b/cans such as C.parapsilosis, C.tropicalis, C.glabrata, and C.krusei are escalating. Except blood culture, novel diagnostic methods such as β-D-glucan (BDG), PCR assays and mannan/anti-mannan immunoglobulin G are helpful in empirical therapy. As the changes in Candida species and drug resistance, echinocandins are the first choice for patients. Meanwhile the inappropriate drug use in clinical treatment should be highlighted.
出处 《国际流行病学传染病学杂志》 CAS 2016年第5期342-345,共4页 International Journal of Epidemiology and Infectious Disease
关键词 念珠菌血症 耐药性 危险因素 诊断 抗真菌药 Candidemia Drug resistance Risk factors Diagnosis Antifungal drugs
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Azie N, Neofytos D, Pfaller M, et al. The PATH (Prospective Antifungal Therapy) Alliance registry and invasive fungal infec- tions: update 2012[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2012, 73 (4): 293-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.06.012.
  • 2Guinea J. Global trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2014, 20 Suppl 6: 5-10. DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12539.
  • 3Yang ZT, Wu L, Liu XY, et al. Epidemiology, species distribu- tion and outcome of nosocomial Condida spp. bloodstream infec- tion in Shanghai[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2014, 14: 241. DOI: 10. 1186/1471-2334-14-241.
  • 4Wisplinghoff H, Ebbers J, Geurtz L, et al. Nosocomial blood- stream infections due to Candida spp. in the USA: species distri- bution, clinical features and antifungal susceptibilities[J]. An- timicrob Agents, 2014, 43(1): 78-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag. 2013.09.005.
  • 5Colombo AL, Guimaraes T, Sukienik T, et al. Prognostic factors and historical trends in the epidemiology of candidemia in critical- ly ill patients: an analysis of five multicenter studies sequentially conducted over a 9-year period[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2014, 40 (10):1489-1498. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3400-y.
  • 6Li W, Hu YA, Li FQ, et al. Distribution of yeast isolates from in- vasive infections and their in vitro susceptibility to antifungal a- gents: evidence from 299 cases in a 3-year (2010 to 2012) surveillance study[J]. Mycopathologia, 2015, 179(5/6): 397-405. DOI: 10.1007/s 11046-015-9858-5.
  • 7Berdal JE, Haagensen R, Ranheim T, et al. Nosocomial can- didemia; risk factors and prognosis revisited; 11 years experience from a Norwegian secondary hospital[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(7): e103916. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103916.
  • 8Shigemura K, Osawa K, Jikimoto T, et al. Comparison of the clinical risk factors between Candida albicans and Candida non- albicans species for bloodstream infection[J]. Antibiot (Tokyo), 2014, 67(4): 311-314. DOI: 10.1038/ja.2013.141.
  • 9Pongrticz J, Juhtisz E, Ivtin M, et al. Significance of yeasts in bloodstream infection: Epidemiology and predisposing factors of candidaemia in adult patients at a university hospital (2010- 2014)[.1]. Acta Microbiol Immonol Hung, 2015, 62(3): 317-329. DOI: 10.1556/030.62.2015.3.9.
  • 10Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Pappas PG, Shoham S, et al. Improvement of a clinical prediction rule for clinical trials on prophylaxis for invasive candidiasis in the intensive care unit[J]. Mycoses, 2011, 54 ( 1 ): 46-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01756.x.

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部