摘要
《合同法解释二》第14条施行以来的127则省级以上终审裁判表明,现行实务对"效力性"强制规范的内涵已有基本界定,但对《合同法》第52条第5项之规制逻辑、规范功能、体系关联的把握仍有欠准确。规范适用的形式维度中,既有的描述型和要件型进路均不乏疑义,体系和目的方法的运用亦有待充实。规范适用的实质维度中,裁判实务贡献了规制对象的三方面区分、合同履行情况、主张无效者本身违法或明知相对方违法等规范内外的多项评价要点,但其内在机理应再作梳辨。"效力性"与"管理性"二分的实务困境表明,应肯认和发掘《合同法》第52条第5项的"一般条款"功能。
After Article 14 of the Interpretation II of the Supreme People＇s Court of Several Issues con- cerning the Application of the Contract Law went into effect, 127 related cases at and above the provincial level show that the current judicial practice has developped a basic comprehension about the concept of the mandatory rules on validity. However, the conduct of normative cle 52 （5） of the Contract Law do not appear to be precise enou lo~ gh. ic, function and systematic role of Arti From the perspective of formal dimen sion, there are different defects in the current descriptive approach and conditional approach, and the level of applying systematic and teleological interpretation should also be promoted. From the perspective of es- sential dimension, the judicial practice has provided a few key elements, such as three different regulative objects, the situation of performance of contract, and the situation that the complainant for invalidity him- self violates the law or is aware of the illegality of the other party, hut their interior logic is still not clear e- nough. To deal with the dilemma resulted from the distinction between mandatory rules on validity and mandatory rules on administration, it is necessary to develop Article 52 （5） of the Contract Law as a gener- al clause.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期1262-1288,共27页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
作者主持的国家社科基金青年项目"违约金条款类型化规制研究"(15CFX059)
上海市教育委员会
上海市教育发展基金会"晨光计划"项目(14CG53)的阶段性成果
关键词
强制规范
效力性
管理性
合同效力
裁判实务
Mandatory Rules
Regulation on Validity
Regulation on Administratiom Validity of Contract
Judicial Practice
