1CookW, Green R, Zhu J. Dual-role Factors in Data EnvelopmentAnalysis[J]. HE Transactions, 2006, 38(2).
2NoorizadehA, Mahdiloo M, Farzipoor Saen R. Using DEA Cross-effi-ciency Evaluation for Suppliers Ranking in the Presence of Non-dis-cretionary InputsfJ]. International Journal of Shipping and TransportLogistics, 2013,5(1).
3MahdilooM,Noorizadeh A, Saen R F. A New Model for SuppliersRanking in the Presence of Both Dual-role Factors and UndesirableOutputs[J]. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Manage-ment, 2013,15(1).
4ChenW C. Revisiting Dual-role Factors in Data Envelopment Analy-sis: Derivation and ImplicationsfJ]. IIE Transactions, 2014,46(7).
5WangY M, Greatbanks R, Yang J B. Interval Efficiency AssessmentUsing Data Envelopment Analysis[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2005,153(3).
3Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of deeision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2 (6) : 429- 444.
4Zilla S S, Lea F. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140 (2) :249- 256.
5Sexton T R, Silkman R H, Hogan A J. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions[C]//Silkman R H ( Ed. ), Measuring efficiency : An assessment of data envelopment analysis, Jossey-Bass , San Francisco, 1986.
6Doyle J R, Green R H. Cross Evaluation in DEA: improving discrimination among DMUs[J]. INFOR, 1995, 33 (3):205 - 222.
7Doyle J R, Green R H. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45 (5) :567 - 578.
8Doyle J, Green R, Cook W D. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross evaluation[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 90 (3): 461-472.
9Norio Hibiki. Evaluation techniques with a modified cross efficiency in DEA[J]. Journal of the Operations Research Society in Japan, 1998, 41(2):229-245.
10Talluri S, Yoon K P. A cone-ratio DEA approach for AMT justification[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2000, 66 (2): 119-129.
