期刊文献+

鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜试验研究不同香波对眼的刺激强度 被引量:2

Study on Eye Irritation Intensity of Different Shampoos by Het-Cam Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜试验(Het-Cam Test)研究6款香波对眼的刺激强度。分别配制质量分数1%的香波溶液,取0.3 m L溶液滴加在鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜上,反应5 min,对试验过程录影并拍照,并根据刺激评分(IS)法测评结果。结果发现:(1)由索芙特提供的焗油修复类型和氨基酸表活无硅类型香波为轻度刺激品,清爽去屑类型香波为中度刺激品,P品牌焗油护理香波为轻度刺激品,清爽去屑香波为中度刺激品,Z品牌无硅生姜香波为轻度刺激品;(2)去屑类香波的刺激性比其他品类略高;(3)在本试验所采用的香波样品中,含聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS)的香波和不含PDMS的香波都是轻度刺激品,但含PDMS的香波刺激评分(IS)比不含PDMS的香波低。 By Het - Cam Test, the eye irritation intensities of six shampoos were studied. The mass amount of 1% shampoo solutions were prepared respectively, 0.3 mL of each was dropped onto chicken embryo villus allantois membrane to react for 5 rain, while videoing and picturing the trial process, and the assessment was finished according to the stimulus scoring method (IS). The results showed: (1) repair shampoo provided by Softto and silicon free shampoo based on amino acids had mild irritation, relaxed and dandruff type shampoo had moderate irritation, P brand treatment nursing shampoo had light irritation, dandruff refreshing shampoo had moderate irritation, Z brand silicon free ginger shampoo had light irritation. (2) the dandruff type shampoo had higher irritation than other products. (3) the shampoo samples containing the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) or without PDMS used in this study all had mild irritation, but the rating (IS) result of shampoo with PDMS was lower than that of shampoo without PDMS.
出处 《香料香精化妆品》 CAS 2016年第5期47-49,53,共4页 Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics
关键词 眼刺激性 鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜试验 聚二甲基硅氧烷 eye irritation Het - Cam test poly dimethyl siloxane (PDMS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献42

  • 1薛虹宇,印桂琪,Evelyn G.Su.防腐剂的作用及有效性评价方法概述[J].日用化学品科学,2004,27(7):41-44. 被引量:23
  • 2李玉衡.揭开去屑洗发剂“神奇”功效真相[J].首都医药,2006,13(5):32-34. 被引量:10
  • 3Draize JH,Woodard G, Calvery HO.Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to skin and mucous membranes. J Pharm Exp Ther.1944;82:377-390.
  • 4Gupta KC, Chambers WA, GreenS, et al.An eye irritation test protocol and an evaluation and classification system. Food Chem Toxicol. 1993;31 (2):117-121.
  • 5Balls M, Fentem JH. The validation and acceptance of alternatives to animal testing. Toxicol In Vitro. 1999; 13(4): 837-846.
  • 6Isabelle V, Butterworth A,Bock B, et al. European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2008; 113(4): 279-297.
  • 7Spielmann H, Grune B, Liebsch M, et aI.Successful validation of in vitro methods in toxicology by ZEBET, the National Centre for Alternatives in Germany at the BfR (Federal Institute for Risk Assessment). Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2008;60(2-3):225-233.
  • 8Hartung T. Reduction and replacement--ECVAM's response to REACH. Toxicology.2007;231 (2-3):91-92.
  • 9Casati S, Rovida C.Progress in the development of alternative approaches. Toxicol Lett.2008; 180(Supplement 1): S14-S15.
  • 10Takahashi Y, Koike M, Honda H, et al.Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: an in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2008;22(3):760-770.

共引文献22

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部