期刊文献+

意象对话疗法在投射测验中的应用 被引量:5

The Application of Imagery Communication Psychotherapy in Projective Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为一种创新型投射测验,意象投射测验与传统投射测验都是以心理动力学理论为基础,对人格的深层结构进行的有效测量。与以往的投射测验相比,意象投射测验将意象对话心理学引入投射测验,通过被试所选意象的象征意义反映出其不同层面的心理内容以及心理健康状态。根据意象心理学理论中意象的象征意义,意象投射测验可根据学术研究或临床实践的需要延展为一系列科学的测量工具。该测验不以诊断为目的,旨在呈现被试更深层的心理内容。 As an innovative projective test, the imagery projective test aimed at measuring the deep instruction of person- ality based on psychodynamics theory, which is the same as traditional projective test. Compared to the past projec- tive test, the imagery projective test combined the Imagery Communication Psychology to projective test, and quanti- fied the mental health status by scoring the imagery options which participants chosen. As an important concept in Imagery Communication Psychology, imagery is defined as the imaginative figure which do not exist in reality. In Imagery Communication Psychology, we quantifying the options by marks using expert grading method, based on the mental experience from different aspect and the level of mental health reacted by the imagery of options. Therefore we could score the mental health status of the participants. What the most innovative of imagery projective test is that it is introduced by the Imagery Communication Psychology, that means it could be developed as a set of scientific evolutionary tool of measurement, based on different set of imagery. This measurement purposed to introduce the participants to improve their level of mental health instead of diagnosis.
作者 刘洋 苑媛 LIU Yang YUAN Yuan(Department of Psychology at School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)
出处 《心理技术与应用》 2016年第11期696-701,共6页 Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
基金 中央财经大学社会与心理学院学科推进计划重点项目
关键词 意象 意象对话疗法 投射测验 象征 imagery Imagery Communication Psychotherapy projective test symbolize
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献62

  • 1龚耀先.艾森克个性问卷在我国的修订[J].心理科学通讯,1984,7(4):13-20. 被引量:223
  • 2M.M.P.I.全国协作组.明尼苏达多相个性调查表在我国修订经过及使用评价[J].心理学报,1982,14(4):449-458. 被引量:26
  • 3童辉杰.西方笔迹心理学研究的发展与评价[J].心理学动态,2001,9(3):276-281. 被引量:19
  • 4Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Situational judgment tests in high-stakes settings: Issues and strategies with generating alternate forms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92. 1043-1055.
  • 5Lievens, F., & Sackett, E R. (2006). Video-based versus written situational judgment tests: A comparison in terms of predictive validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1181-1188.
  • 6McDaniel, M. A., Hartman, N. S., Whetzet, D. L., & Grubb, W. L. (2007). Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 63-91.
  • 7McDaniel, M. A., Morgeson, F. P., Finnegan, E. B., Campion, M. A., & Braverman, E. P. (2001). Predicting job performance using situational judgment tests: A clarification of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 730-740.
  • 8McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2001). Situatsional judgment tests: A review of practice and constructs assessed. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 103-113.
  • 9McDaniet, M. A., & Whetzel, D. L. (2005). Situational judgment test research: Informing the debate on practical intelligence theory. Intelligence, 33, 515-525.
  • 10Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette , M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.

共引文献97

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部