期刊文献+

有症状脑动脉粥样硬化患者的危险因素和致卒中机制:青年与中年患者的比较 被引量:3

Risk factors and stroke meclmaisms in patients with symptomatic cerebral mtevy athemsclerosis: compadson of young and niddle-aged patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨青年和中年有症状脑动脉粥样硬化(symptomatic cerdralartery atherosclerosis,sCAA)患者危险因素和致卒中机制的差异。方法连续纳入因sCAA所致缺血性卒中或短暂性缺血发作住院的青年(18~44岁)和中年(45~55岁)患者。根据弥散加权成像所示急性脑梗死灶的分布模式判定sCAA的致卒中机制,包括动脉一动脉栓塞(axtery—artery embolism,AAE)、闭塞旁支动脉(local branch occlusion,LBO)和血流动力学障碍(hemody namic imp airment,HI)。单发卒中机制定义为只存在上述1种机制,多发卒中机制定义为存在上述≥2种机制。结果共纳入186例患者,男性138例;青年组82例,平均年龄(40.11±4.94)岁;中年组104例,平均年龄(51.26±2.97)岁。青年组男性患者比例显著高于中年组(81.71%对68.27%;P=0.043);而中年组高血压(70.19%对47.56%;P=0.002)和糖尿病(38.46%对20.73%;P=0.011)的患者比例显著高于青年组。青年组sCAA累及大脑中动脉更多见(64.63%对48.08%;P=0.002);而中年组累及基底动脉更常见(12.50%xey3.66%;P=o.037)。单4"/2个卒中机制在2组患者中均较常见(青年组49/30,中年组57/42;P=O.645)。在多个卒中机制中,青年组AAE+LBO+HI更多见(16.46%对6.06%;P=0.030),而中年组AAE+HI更为多见(21.21%对3.80%;P=0.001)。结论青年sCAA患者的危险因素和致卒中机制与中年患者存在明显差异,提示青年sCAA具有其独特的病理生理学机制,其防治策略可能有别于中年患者。 Objective To investigate the differences of risk factors and stroke menchanisms between young and middle-aged patients with symptomatic cerebral artery atherosclerosis (sCAA). Metheds The young (18-44 years) and middle-aged (45-55 years) patients with sCAA caused ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack admitted to hospital were enrolled consecutively. According the distribution patterns of acute infarcts on the diffitsion-weighted imaging the stroke mechanisms of sCAA were identified, including artery-artery embolism (AAE), local branch occlusion (LBO), and hemodynamic impairment (HI). Single stroke mechanism was defined as only having I mechanism, and multiple stroke mechanisms were defined as having ≥2 mechanisms. Results A total of 186 patients were enrolled, and 138 patients were males. There were 82 patients in the youth group (mean 40. 11 ±4. 94 years); there were 104 patients in the middle-aged group (mean 51.27 ±2. 97 years). The proportion of male in the youth group was sigfificently higher than that in the middle-age group (81.71% vs. 68.27% ; P =0. 043), and hypertension (70. 19% vs. 47. 56% ; P=0.002) and diabetes (38.46% vs. 20.73%; P=0.011) in the middle-aged group were significantly higher than those in the youth group, sCAA involved the middle cerebral artery was more common in the youth group (64. 63% vs. 48. 08%; P=0. 002), and sCAA involved the basilar artery was more common in the middle-aged group (12. 50% vs. 3.66% ; P =0. 037). The single or multiple stroke mechanisms were more common in both groups (the youth group, 49/30; the middle-aged group 57/42; P =0. 645). In multiple stroke mechanisms, AAE +LBO +HI in the youth group was more common (16.46% vs. 6. 06%; P= 0. 030), and AAE + HI was more common in the middle-aged group (21.21% vs. 3.80%; P = 0. 001). Conclusions There are significant differences in the risk factors and stroke mechanisms between the young and the middle-aged patients with CAA stroke, suggesting that the young patients with sCAA had its unique pathophysiological mechanism. Its control strategy may be different from the middle-aged patients.
出处 《国际脑血管病杂志》 2016年第9期819-826,共8页 International Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
基金 国家自然科学基金(81571107) 广东省医学科研基金(A2016107)
关键词 卒中 脑缺血 颅内动脉硬化 颅内栓塞 磁共振成像 脑血管造影术 危险因素 年轻人 中年人 Stroke Brain Ischemia Intracranial Arteriosclerosis Intracranial Embolism Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cerebral Angiography Risk Factors Young Adult Middle Aged
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献85

  • 1王桂红,郑华光,王伊龙,姜卫剑,王拥军.缺血性脑卒中患者颅内/外脑大动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的分布及其预测因素[J].中国卒中杂志,2006,1(8):543-547. 被引量:25
  • 2Putaxtla J, Metso AJ, Metso TM, et al. Analysis of 1008 consecu-rive patients aged 15 to 49 with first-ever ischemic stroke: the Helsinki young stroke registry [ J ]. Stroke, 2009, 40: 1195-1203.
  • 3Adams HP Jr, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, et al. Ischemic stroke in young adults. Experience in 329 patients enrolled in the Iowa Registry of stroke in young adults [ J]. Arch Neurol, 1995, 52: 491-495.
  • 4Kittner S J, Stern BJ, Wozniak M, et al. Cerebral infarction in young adults: the Baltimore-Washington Cooperative Young Stroke Study[J]. Neurology, 1998, 50: 890-894.
  • 5Jacobs BS, Boden-Albala B, Lin IF, et al. Stroke in the young in the northern Manhattan stroke study [ j ]. Stroke, 2002, 33: 2789-2793.
  • 6Qureshi AI, Safdar K, Patel M, et al. Stroke in young black patients. Risk factors, subtypes, and prognosis [ J ]. Stroke, 1995, 26: 1995-1998.
  • 7Naess H, Nyland HI, Thorrmssen L, et al. Incidence and short-term outcome of cerebral infarction in young adults in western Norway [J]. Stroke, 2002, 33: 2105-2108.
  • 8George MG, Tong X, Kuklina EV, et al. Trends in stroke hospi- talizations and associated risk factors among children and young adults, 1995-2008[ J]. Ann Neurol, 2011, 70: 713-721.
  • 9Kissela BM, Khoury JC, Alwell K, et al. Age at stroke: temporal trends in stroke incidence in a large, biracial population [ J ]. Neurology, 2012, 79: 1781-1787.
  • 10Ferro JM, Massaro AR, Mas JL. Aetiological diagnosis of ischaemic stroke in young adults [ J ]. Lancet Neurol, 2010, 9: 1085-1096.

共引文献18

同被引文献12

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部