摘要
目前无论是学术界还是司法实务部门对逃避侦查的认识莫衷一是。逃避侦查的判定应当结合设立时效制度的初衷,并联系刑事诉讼法的相关规定进行。对于行为人在实施犯罪过程中毁灭证据、伪造现场等行为,犯罪后逃离犯罪现场,到案后不如实供述自己的罪行或者对抗审讯等行为均不能认定为逃避侦查行为。判定为逃避侦查必须发生在侦查机关立案侦查以后,行为人主观上具有逃避侦查的故意,并且行为人实施了积极、主动的逃避刑事追究的行为。
There is controversy over what escaping detection is both in academic circle and judicial practice departments. The paper holds that escaping detection should be interpreted combined with the purpose of setting up prescription system and related provisions of the criminal procedure law. Such acts in the process of committing a crime as destroying evidence deliberately, simulating offense scene, fleeing from the scene of the crime after committing a crime, not truthfully confessing his crime, or confronting against a trial, can not considered as escaping detection behavior. On the contrary, if an offender has positive and active activities to escape criminal prosecution deliberately after the case has been filed, such behavior of the offender can be seen as act of escaping detection.
出处
《江苏警官学院学报》
2016年第5期65-69,共5页
Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute
关键词
逃避侦查
追诉时效
刑事诉讼
escape detection
limitation of prosecution
criminal action
