期刊文献+

PiCCO监测对指导脓毒性休克患者液体复苏治疗的价值 被引量:19

Guiding value of PiCCO monitoring on fluid resuscitation therapy in patients with septic shock
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨脉搏指示连续心输出量(PiCCO)监测对脓毒性休克患者液体复苏治疗的价值。方法选取2013年5月至2015年5月76例脓毒性休克患者作为研究对象,进行随机分组;其中对照组38例,根据中心静脉压(CVP)指导液体复苏治疗;观察组38例,根据PiCCO监测参数值指导液体复苏治疗。对比两组患者复苏治疗的CVP、平均动脉压(MAP)、中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)、氧合指数[动脉血氧分压与呼入氧浓度的比值(PaO_2/FiO_2)]、血乳酸、机械通气时间、入住ICU天数及病死率;根据患者复苏治疗7 d后的存活与否,分为存活组与病死组,对比两组患者的PiCCO监测参数值。结果 76例患者复苏治疗7 d后,存活43例,病死33例,病死率43.42%;存活组与病死组患者的心脏指数(CI)、每搏量变异(SVV)、全心舒张末期容积指数(GEDI)、血管外肺水指数(ELWI)和MAP均具有统计学差异(P均<0.05);观察组患者复苏治疗后的CVP、MAP、ScvO2水平均显著高于对照组,PaO_2/FiO_2、血乳酸水平、病死率均显著低于对照组,机械通气时间、入住ICU天数均显著短于对照组,两组比较均有统计学差异(P均<0.05)。结论 PiCCO监测参数CI、SVV、GEDI、ELWI和MAP均与脓毒性休克患者的预后密切相关,根据PiCCO监测参数值指导脓毒性休克患者的液体复苏治疗,可显著纠正患者的血流动力学及氧代谢失常,协同提高临床疗效,改善预后。 Objective To investigate the guiding value of pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring for fluid resuscitation therapy in patients with septic shock. Methods Seventy-six patients with septic shock were selected as research objective and were randomly divided into two groups (n = 38 each) :control group [ fluid resuscitation therapy was guided by central venous pressure(CVP) ] and observation group( fluid resuscitation therapy was guided by PiCCO monitoring parameters). CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2 ), oxygenation index [ arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspiration oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ], blood lactic acid, mechanical ventilation time, ICU stay time and fatality rate were compared between two groups. Moreover, the patients were re-divided into survival group and death group according to survival or not of patients after resuscitation treatment of 7 days, and PiCCO monitoring parameters in the two groups were compared. Results Out of 76 cases after resuscitation treatment of 7 clays ,43 survived, and 33 cases died, so the fatality rate was 43.42%. There were significant differences in cardiac index (CI) , stroke volume variation (SVV) ,global end diastolic volume index (GEDI) ,external lung water index (ELWI) and MAP between survival group and death group ( all P 〈 0.05 ). After resuscitation treatment, the levels of CVP, MAP and ScvOz in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group;PaO2/FiO2, blood lactic acid level and fatality rate in observation group were significantly lower than those in control group;mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay time in observation group were significantly shorter than those in control group ( all P 〈0.05). Conclusions The PiCCO monitoring parame-ters CI, SVV, GEDI, ELWI and MAP are closely associated with the prognosis of patients with septic shock. The fluid resus-citation therapy guided by PiCCO monitoring parameters can significantly correct the abnormalities of hemodynamics and oxygen metabolism, cooperatively improve clinical efficacy and prognosis.
出处 《中国临床研究》 CAS 2016年第11期1466-1469,1476,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Research
关键词 脓毒性休克 液体复苏治疗 脉搏指示持续心输出量 中心静脉压 Septic shock Fluid resuscitation therapy Pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output Central venous pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献55

  • 1成人严重感染与感染性休克血流动力学监测与支持指南[J].中华内科杂志,2007,46(4):344-349. 被引量:91
  • 2Murphy CV,Schramm GE,Doherty JA, et al. The importance offluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock[ J].Chest,2009,136(1) :102-109.
  • 3Sakka SG, Huhl CC, Pfeiffer UJ, et al. Assessment of cardiac pre-load andextravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodi-lution [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2000,26(2) : 180-187.
  • 4Gao F, Melody T, Daniels DF, et al. The impact of compliancewith 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in pa-tients with severe sepsis : a prospective observational study [J]. CritCare, 2005,9(6) :R764-770.
  • 5Bein B, Meybohm P, Cavus E,et al. The reliability of pulse cont-ourderived cardiac output during hemorrhage and after vasop ressoradministration[ J]. Anesth Analg,2007 ,105 ( 1 ) : 107-113.
  • 6Luecke T, Roth H, Herrmann P, et al. Assessment of cardiac pre-load and left ventricular function under increasing levels of positiveend expiratory pressure [ J ]. Intensive Care Med,2004, 30 ( 1 ):119-126.
  • 7Donnino MW, Clardy P, Talmor D. A central venous pressure goalof 8-12 mmHg for all patients in septic shock [ J]. Crit Care Med,2007,35(5) :1441.
  • 8Fern^ndez-Mond6jar E,Rivera-Fem^ndez R,Garica-Delgado M,etal. Small increases in extravascular lungwater are accurately detec-ted by transpulmonary thermodilution[ J]. J Trauma, 2005,59(6):1420-1423.
  • 9Szakmany T, Heigl P, Molnar Z. Correlation between extravascularlung water and oxygenation in ALI/ ARDS patients in septic shock :possible role in the development of atelectasis[ J] . Anaesth Inten-sive Care, 2004,32(2) : 196-201.
  • 10Goepfert MS, Reuter DA,Akyol D, et al. Goal-directed fluid man-agement reduces vasopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac sur-gery patients[ J] . Intensive Care Med, 2007 ,33 (1) :96-103.

共引文献37

同被引文献158

引证文献19

二级引证文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部