摘要
目的:研究药学服务对哮喘患者的哮喘相关知识掌握程度和哮喘控制情况的影响,推动药师给哮喘患者提供药学服务,提高患者哮喘控制水平。方法:将2015年1月至5月来某院就诊的81例门诊哮喘患者随机分为干预组和对照组进行研究,对照组患者接受正常门诊和哮喘控制测试(asthma control test,ACT)评分,干预组患者接受正常门诊、ACT评分及药师提供的药学服务。3个月后两组患者进行随访,分别接受ACT评分及哮喘知识问卷测试,将ACT评分及哮喘知识问卷测试结果进行统计学分析。结果:对于ACT评分,干预组明显高于对照组(分别为23.193 5±1.492 63和21.548 4±3.304 93),两组间有显著性差异(P<0.05)。对于哮喘相关知识,干预组回答4个问题的正确率(分别为46.67%、55.56%、53.33%、26.67%)全部高于对照组(分别为17.85%、6.45%、13.33%、13.33%),有3个问题两组间有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:药师提供的药学服务可显著增加哮喘患者对哮喘相关知识的掌握程度及ACT评分,药师的药学服务值得推广。
OBJECTIVE To investigate impact of pharmaceutical care on knowledge mastery of asthma and control score in asthmatic patients, improve pharmaceutical care delivered by pharmacists For asthmatic patients. METHODS Eighty one out-patients were enrolled from a hospital from January to May 2015, and randomly divided into two groups: intervention group re- ceiving routine treatment, asthma control test (ACT) and pharmaceutical care provided by pharmacists;control group receiving routine treatment and ACT. After 3 months, ACT and knowledge questionnaires of asthma were distributed to both groups and answers were analyzed statistically. RESULTS ACT in intervention group was significantly higher than that in control group (23. 193 5 + 1. 492 63 and 21. 548 4 + 3. 304 93, respectively) (P〈0. 05). Percentages of correct answer for four questions in intervention group (46.67%, 55.56%, 53.33% and 26.67%, respectively) were higher than those in control group (17. 85%, 6. 45%, 13.33% and 13.33%, respectively) for knowledge mastery of asthma (P〈0. 05). CONCLUSION Phar- maceutical care provided by pharmacists can improve knowledge mastery of asthma and ACT score in asthmatic patients, and is worthy to be promoted.
出处
《中国医院药学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第22期2026-2029,共4页
Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
关键词
药学服务
哮喘
哮喘相关知识
哮喘控制测试
pharmaceutical care
asthma
knowledge of asthma
asthma control test