摘要
目的对比观察循证护理与传统护理方式应用于动脉瘤介入术后患者对其临床效果的影响,并分析探讨循证护理的伦理学意义。方法选取在我院进行介入治疗的动脉瘤患者240例,随机将其分为观察组和对照组,每组均为120人。观察组给予循证护理,对照组患者给予传统护理,观察两组患者住院期间不良反应、并发症的发生情况,以及入院、出院时两组患者的焦虑、抑郁评分和入院、术后6个月时的生活质量核心量表评分。结果观察组患者在住院期间不良反应及并发症的发生率上要显著低于对照组(P<0.05),出院6个月后的生活质量核心量表的总体评分要高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论循证护理能显著减少动脉瘤介入术后患者不良反应及并发症的发生,能有效减轻患者的焦虑、抑郁,有利于患者术后生活质量的提高,客观上有利于追求卓越道德目标以及和谐医患关系的实现。
Objective： To compare the effect of evidence-based nursing and traditional nursing methods in patients with aneurysm after interventional therapy and analyze the ethical significance of evidence-based nursing.Methods： A total of 240 patients with aneurysm were randomly divided into observation group and control group,each group had 120 patients. The observation group received evidence-based nursing,while the patients in the control group were given conventional nursing care. The adverse reactions and complications during hospitalization,the anxiety and depression scores at the time of admission and discharge,and quality of life core scale scores after 6 months of operation were observed. Results： The adverse reaction and complication rate of the patients in the observation group was significantly lower than those of the control group during hospitalization（ P〈0. 05）. The overall score of quality of life core scale of the patients in the observation group was higher than that of the control at 6 months after discharge（ P〈0. 05）. Conclusion： Evidence-based nursing can significantly reduce adverse reactions and complications in the patients with aneurysm after interventional therapy,effectively relieve patients＇ anxiety and depression,improve the quality of life after operation,objectively benefit to the pursuit of excellent moral goals and harmonious doctor-patient relationship.
出处
《中国医学伦理学》
2016年第6期1021-1024,共4页
Chinese Medical Ethics
关键词
循证护理
动脉瘤
介入治疗
生活质量
Evidence-based Nursing
The Aneurysm
Interventional Therapy
Quality of Life
