摘要
目的探讨联合两种不同口径输尿管镜治疗复杂性输尿管结石治疗效果。方法整群选取该院2013年11月—2015年2月该院收治的复杂性输尿管结石患者107例为研究对象,随机分为联合组(55例)和常规组(52例),两组均采用输尿管镜和钬激光碎石术。联合组术中联合应用口径6.5/8.5 F和8.0/9.8 F输尿管镜,常规组术中仅用8.0/9.8 F输尿管镜治疗,比较两组碎石成功率、血尿时间。结果术中联合组和常规组碎石成功率分别为98.18%(54/55)和82.69%(43/52),联合组术后血尿时间(10.0±2.0)d,常规组(16.0±4.0)d,两组比较差异有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论联合两种不同口径输尿管镜治疗复杂性输尿管结石,使得结石碎石成功率明显提高。
Objective To investigate the effect of two kinds of ureteroscopic with different sizes of diameters in complex ureteral calculi. Methods Group selection 107 patients with complicated ureteral calculi in our hospital from December 2013 to April 2014 were randomly divided into the combined group （55 cases） and the conventional group （52 cases）. The two groups were treated with holmium laser lithotripsy. Two kinds of ureteroscopic 8.0/9.8 F and 6.5/8.5 F were used in the combination group, and 8.0/9.8 F was used in the treatment of the conventional group,the success rate of lithotripsy and hematuria time in the two groups were compared. Results The success rate of the combined group and conventional group was 98.18% （54/55） and 82.69% （43/52）, the time of postoperative hematuria with the combined group was（10.0±2.0）d, and the normal group （ 16.0±4.0）d, the difference was significant（P〈O.05）. Conclusion Combined two kinds of different diameter of ureteroscopic in the treatment of complex ureteral calculi, the success rate of stone lithotripsy is obviously improved.
出处
《中外医疗》
2016年第32期93-95,共3页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
联合应用输尿管镜
复杂性输尿管结石
碎石成功率
Combined application
Ureteroscopic
Complex ureteral calculi
Lithotripsy success rate of ureteral calculi
