摘要
建构国际关系理论的中国学派至少可以遵循两条路径:一是"核心问题驱动路径";二是"观念引导路径"。核心问题能否推动中国学派的生成在很大程度上取决于问题的性质。有助于实现这一目标的核心问题应该是不易受外交政策影响、具有重大理论价值的经验性问题而非规范性问题。不仅如此,该路径可能还必须回应"泛目的性"的质疑并解决集体行动问题。观念则包括关于世界政治的本体论、认识论和方法论。它们是人性的一部分,具有高度的稳定性和同构性,从而赋予了"观念引导路径"以较强的自然演化属性。两条路径虽然取向不同,但可以并行不悖地共同促进中国学派的生成。
The construction of the Chinese School of International Relations may be either driven by the 'core research questions'or channeled by the shared ideas of an academic community.The effectiveness of the first approach significantly depends upon the nature of the core question per se. Such questions should be those not so easily influenced by the foreign policy of the state. Instead of being normative in nature,the'core question'is supposed to be empirical and of high theoretical importance. Moreover,scholars along this line of research may need to tackle the challenge of pan- teleology and the collective action problem. On the other hand,ideas,defined as the ontology,epistemology and methodology about world politics,are very convertible to each other. As part and parcel of the human nature,ideas are deeply entrenched as well. For all these reasons,the approach guided by shared ideas encourages the natural evolution of knowledge as a matter of fact. Despite the differences in the two approaches,they are expected to concurrently promote the construction of the Chinese School of International Relations.
出处
《欧洲研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期126-149,共24页
Chinese Journal of European Studies