超声引导下高位股神经阻滞在高龄患者腰硬联合麻醉前体位变动中镇痛效果研究被引量：9

The effect of ultrasound-guided high-position femoral nerve block in elderly patients at the time of changing position before combined spinal-epidural anesthesia

原文传递

导出

摘要目的：观察不同镇痛方法在髋部骨折手术麻醉前体位变动的镇痛效果。方法：选择ASA分级Ⅱ~Ⅲ级择期行在腰硬联合麻醉下行髋部骨折手术患者60例,按随机数字表法分为3组：高位股神经阻滞组（N组）、静脉镇痛组（P组）及对照组（C组）,每组20例。分别记录各组入室10min（T1）、镇痛处理前即刻（T1）、镇痛处理后15min（T2）、体位变动即刻（T3）、摆好麻醉体位时（T4）、维持麻醉体位1min（T5）的MAP和HR、VAS评分、呼吸抑制（呼吸次数〈10次/min）的发生率、SPO2,记录腰硬联合麻醉穿刺的成功率及穿刺的时间,评估患者配合程度及满意度。结果：N组的疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS评分）、MAP和HR于T2、T3、T4、T5均显著低于P组及C组（P〈0.05）,P组呼吸抑制的发生率大于N组和C组,腰硬联合麻醉穿刺的成功率N组大于P组及C组。结论：超声引导下高位股神经阻滞可以明显缓解老年患者髋部骨折手术麻醉前体位变动疼痛,血流动力学更平稳。 Objective：To investigate the application of ultrasound-guided high-position femoral nerve block in elderly patients with hip fracture at the time of changing position before combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.Method：Sixty ASA Ⅱ-Ⅲ patients,who were randomly divided into the three group（N=20）：high position femoral nerve block group（group N）,intravenous analgesia group（group P）,control group（group C）.The mean arterial pressure（MAP）,heart rate（HR）,visual analgesia score（VAS）,respiratory depression and SPO2 were recorded at the point of 10 min after entering the operation room（T0）,the time before anesthesia（T1）,15 min after analgesia（T2）,the immediate time at changing of position（T3）,at the time of finishing anesthesia position（T4）and maintaining anesthesia position 1 min（T5）.The succeed rate of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia,the punctured time,the cooperation and the satisfaction of patients were recorded.Result：Compared with group P and group C,MAP and HR of group N decreased significantly at T2-T5（P〈0.05）.Respiratory depression rate was much higher in group P（P〈0.05）.Compared with group P and group C,the succeed rate of combined spinal-epidural was much higher in group N.Conclusion：Ultrasound-guided high position femoral nerve block can significantly release the pain at the time of changing position before combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in elderly patients with hip fracture surgery and the hemodynamic was much more stable.

作者龚文魁王美容贾振华何妹仪柳垂亮沈柏儒

机构地区佛山市禅城区中心医院麻醉科佛山市禅城区中心医院胸外科

出处《临床急诊杂志》 CAS 2016年第11期863-865,共3页 Journal of Clinical Emergency

基金 2014佛山市卫生局医学科研项目(No:2014178) 2015年佛山市医学科研基金项目(No:2015133)

关键词股神经阻滞髋部骨折体位变动镇痛 femoral nerve block hip fracture change of position analgesia

分类号 R614.4 [医药卫生—麻醉学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1胡光俊,宋晓阳,陈敏,陶军.股神经三合一复合坐骨神经阻滞用于膝部手术的临床研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2014,30(2):163-165. 被引量：20
2郭小文,吕晨,张娟,黄蓉蓉.髂筋膜腔隙阻滞在老年股骨颈骨折患者腰硬联合麻醉前摆放体位时的应用研究[J].浙江医学,2013,35(12):1138-1140. 被引量：14

二级参考文献14

1顾华华,车薛华,李佩盈,梁伟民.刺激电流大小对上肢肘以下外科手术患者锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞成功率的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(21):1470-1473. 被引量：11
2宣林娜,刁枢.神经刺激器指导实施下肢神经联合阻滞的麻醉效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(8):648-650. 被引量：1
3Indelli P F, Grant S A, Nielsen K, et al. Regional anesthesia in hip surgery[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005, 441(12): 250-255.
4De Tran Q H, Clemente A, Finlayson R J. A review of approaches andtechniquesforlower extremity nerve blocks [J]. Can J Anaesth, 2007, 54( 11 ): 922-934.
5Stevens M, Harrison G, McGrail M. A modified fascia iliaca com- partment block has significant morphine-sparing effect after total hip arthroplasty[J]. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2007, 35(6): 949-952.
6Dalens B, Vanneuville G, Tanguy A. Comparison of the fascia ili- aca compartment block with the 3-in-1 block in children [J]. Anesth Analg, 1989, 69(6): 705-713.
7Capdevila X, Biboulet P, Bouregba M, et al. Comparison of the three-in-one and fascia iliaca compartment blocks in ad u Its: clinical and radio- graphic analysis[J]. Anesth Analg, 1998, 86(5): 1039-1044.
8Yun M J, Kim Y H, Han M K, et al. Analgesia before a spinal block for femoral neck fracture: fascia iliaca compartment block[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2009, 53(10):1282-1287.
9Haines L, Dickman E, Ayvazyan S, et al. Mltrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block for hip fractures in the emergen- cy department[J]. J Emerg Med, 2012, 43(4): 692-697.
10Lopez S, Gros T, Bernard N, et al. Fascia iliaca compartment block for femoral bone fractures in prehospital care[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2003, 28(3): 203-207.