期刊文献+

庭审实质化与鉴定意见的有效质证 被引量:16

Substantiation of Court Trial and Valid Examination of Appraisal Opinion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "以审判为中心"的核心在于"以庭审为中心",重在落实"庭审的实质化"和加强控辩对抗和有效质证。但在以往的司法实践中,庭审形式化却直接导致了鉴定意见审查的形式化,为解决这一问题,2012年我国对《刑事诉讼法》中有关司法鉴定问题有针对性地作了多处重大修改,取得了一定效果。未来的司法实践中,在保障新的《刑事诉讼法》贯彻落实的同时,需要有针对性地对相关制度加以完善,进一步端正对鉴定意见的认识、落实鉴定人出庭的规定、明确"有专门知识的人"的法律定位、实现对鉴定意见的有效质证。 The core of " taking- trial- as- center " lies at the "court-room-hearing ", focusing on the implementation of"substantive trial" and strengthening of the confrontation between the prosecutor and the defense lawyer, and effective examination. However, in the past judicial practice, the formalization of trial has directly led to the formalization of the review of appraisal opinions. In order to solve this problem, the provisions in the 2012 amendment of the "Criminal Procedure Law" had a number of significant changes regarding judicial appraisal, and achieved some results. In the future, while ensuring the implementation of the new Criminal Procedure Law, it is necessary to improve the relevant systems, further deepen the understanding of the appraisal opinions, implement the regulations regarding the appraisers' appearing in court,clarify the position of "people with special knowledge", and to achieve an effective cross-examination of appraisal opinions.
作者 卞建林 谢澍
出处 《中国司法鉴定》 2016年第6期1-5,共5页 Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
基金 国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心项目
关键词 庭审实质化 以审判为中心 鉴定意见 有专门知识的人 质证 substantive trial trial-centered appraisal opinion expert with special knowledge cross-examination
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献113

共引文献740

同被引文献219

引证文献16

二级引证文献135

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部