期刊文献+

考虑非期望产出的大中城市公交营运效率评价 被引量:4

Operation Efficiency Evaluation for Public Transport of Large and Medium-Sized Cities Based on Undesirable Output
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考虑公交运营的服务特性和非期望产出带来的负面影响,以我国35个大中城市公交运营系统为研究样本,采用松驰数据包络分析法,构建了公交服务效果与运营效率评价模型。结果显示:考虑非期望产出对公交的运营效率评价影响显著,公交服务效果和运营效率的平均分值分别为:0.61,0.64,较考虑非期望产出前均有所下降,下降幅度分别为6.2%,7.2%。研究表明,我国大中城市公交整体运营效率仍然有待提高,实施不同分类城市的差异化需求管理策略、发展清洁能源车辆、加强对公交服务质量的监督和管理是提高效率的重点。 Considering the service characteristics and negative impact resulted from the undesirable output of public transport, taking the public transport operation systems of thirty-five large and medium-sized cities in China as empirical samples, an evaluation model of the service effect and operational efficiency of public transport was established based on Slack Based Model and Data Envelopment Analysis (SBM-DEA) method. A conclusion is summarized that considering undesirable output has significant impact on the operational efficiency evaluation of public transport. The average value of the service effect and operation efficiency of public transport are 0.61, 0.64, which decline by 6.2%, 7.2%compared with the values of these without considering undesirable output. The overall efficiency of public transport in large and medium cities in China still needs improving. Implementation of differentiated demand management strategies, development of clean energy vehicles and strengthening the supervision of public transport services are the key points to improve efficiency.
作者 章玉 ZHANG Yu(Chongqing Communications Planning Survey and Design Institute, Chongqing 401121, China)
出处 《交通运输研究》 2016年第6期32-37,共6页 Transport Research
关键词 交通运输经济 公共交通 松驰数据包络分析 运营效率 非期望产出 transport economy public transport SBM-DEA evaluation operation efficiency unde-sirable output
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献85

  • 1林盛,刘金兰,韩文秀.基于PLS-结构方程的顾客满意度评价方法[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(6):653-656. 被引量:47
  • 2朱微微,赵定涛.中国城市公共交通行业技术效率实证研究[J].运筹与管理,2007,16(2):154-158. 被引量:2
  • 3MAGNUS S. A Broad Performance Benchmark Based on Citizens Preferences [J]. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 2009, 80(4): 579-603.
  • 4WILLIAM R, ANNE Y B. Ownership, Contractual Practices and Technical Efficiency: The Case of Urban Public Transport in France [J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 2007, 41(2): 257-282.
  • 5OTTOZ E F G, DI G M .The Impact of Ownership on the Cost of Bus Service Provision:An Example from Italy[J]. Applied Economice, 2009, 41(3): 337-349.
  • 6ANDREA B, MARCELLA N, CARLO S. Do Competition and Ownership Matter? Evidence from Local Public Transport in Europe [EB/OL]. (2010-1 -20) [2011 -2-27] http://istituti. unicatt.it/teoria._economica_metodi_quantitativi_ 160210.pdf.
  • 7VICENTE P, LOURDES T. Analysis of the Efficiency of Local Government Services Delivery: An Application to Urban Public Transport[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2001, 35(10): 929-944.
  • 8SUZANNE L, OLGA S. Reassessing Privatization Strategies 25 Years Later: Revisiting PenT and Babitsky Comparative Performance Study of Urban Bus Transit Service[J]. Public Administration Review, 2009, 69(5 ) : 855-867.
  • 9.l F M K, BERT E. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Infrastructures: Reconciling Private Sector Participation and Sustainability[J]. Public Administration Review, 2009, 69 (2) : 284-296.
  • 10VAND De Velde D M . Organizational Forms and Entre- preneurship in Public Transport [J]. Transport Policy, 1999, 6(3): 147-157.

共引文献57

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部