摘要
对于历史叙事和历史小说之间的区别这一议题,安克施密特的回答不能令人满意。每一个叙事都可以区分出三个层面,即微观、中观和宏观,据此可以相对有效地区分历史叙事和历史小说。它们之间的区别有两点:其一是它们各自的三个层面之间的逻辑关系不同,其二是它们各自对于"真实性"的要求不同。根据这一区分标准,我们发现历史叙事和历史小说之间依然存在交集,这是叙述主义可以把历史叙事美学化、历史学和文学趋同的原因所在。
Ankersmit＇s answer to what the difference between historical narration and historical novel cannot be satisfactory. Every narration contains three logical levels, the micro, the middle and the macro. Therefore two differences between historical narration and historical novel are as followsone is the logical relation ex- isting respectively among their three levels, the other is their respective demand of ＂truth＂. Furthermore, there is still an overlap between them which is the reason why narrativism could aesthetieize historical narration and why the historiography and the literature go to converge.
出处
《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2016年第6期1274-1278,共5页
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词
历史叙事
历史小说
真实性
historical narration
historical novel
truth
